Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Validity of r^4ρ(r) weighting for reducing shape sensitivity in Barrett-parameter fitting

Ascertain whether using the r^4ρ(r) weighting in the least-squares fit of the muonic potential difference V_μ^i(r) − V_μ^f(r) to the model B r^k e^{−α r} reduces residual charge-distribution shape sensitivity compared to r^2ρ(r) weighting when extracting Barrett parameters and root-mean-square nuclear charge radii for medium-mass nuclei, specifically the chlorine isotopes 35Cl and 37Cl.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

To minimize charge-distribution model dependence in muonic x-ray radius extraction, the Barrett-moment method fits the potential difference generated by the muon in the initial and final states to B rk e{−α r} and uses the fitted parameters (k, α) to define a model-independent Barrett radius. The weighting used in the least-squares fit can influence residual shape sensitivity.

Earlier literature claimed that weighting the fit with r4ρ(r) (instead of r2ρ(r), which matches the integrand of the Barrett moment) could reduce shape sensitivity. In this paper, the authors adopted r2ρ(r) weighting and report that they could not reproduce the claimed benefit of r4ρ(r) weighting, noting identical extracted RMS radii (though with different fitted k and α). Whether r4ρ(r) weighting genuinely improves shape robustness in medium-mass nuclei remains unresolved.

References

In the past, authors claimed that weights of r4 ρ(r) could give less shape sensitivity, but we could not reproduce this argument and the extracted RMS radii remained identical (though, with different values for k and \alpha).

Modern approach to muonic x-ray spectroscopy demonstrated through the measurement of stable Cl radii (2506.08804 - Beyer et al., 10 Jun 2025) in Section “Barrett radii” (Theory)