Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Banach-valued versus real-valued W^{1,p} extension domains for low integrability

Ascertain whether, for exponents p ∈ [1,n), a domain Ω ⊂ R^n is a Banach-valued W^{1,p}-extension domain for every Banach space V if and only if it is a real-valued W^{1,p}-extension domain.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The authors recall their recent work on Banach-valued W{1,p}-extension domains, where they established that for p ≥ n, a domain is a Banach-valued extension domain if and only if it is a real-valued extension domain. They highlight that the corresponding equivalence for the range p ∈ [1,n) has not been settled.

Resolving this would align the Banach-valued extension theory for low integrability exponents with the established high-integrability case and clarify whether vector-valued extension properties introduce genuinely new geometric constraints at low p.

References

In the recent work , we considered Banach-valued $W{1,p}$-extension sets for exponents $p \in (1,\infty)$. More specifically, we were interested in determining whether a domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}n$ is a Banach-valued $W{1,p}$-extension domain if and only if it is a real-valued $W{1,p}$-extension domain, see e.g. for background on the topic. We verified the equivalence for $p \in [n,\infty)$ while the case $p \in [1,n)$ remains open, cf. Question 1.1.

Infinity thick quasiconvexity and applications (2509.01194 - García-Bravo et al., 1 Sep 2025) in Section 5 (Sobolev extension sets)