Analogue of the universal law for general elliptic KdV potentials
Ascertain whether the differential relation dτ ∧ dB ≡ 8π dr ∧ ds holds for the monodromy map (τ, B) → (r, s) associated with second-order equations y''(z) = [∑_{j=1}^n m_j(m_j + 1)℘(z − p_j(τ); τ) + B] y(z), where q(z; τ) = ∑_{j=1}^n m_j(m_j + 1)℘(z − p_j(τ); τ) is an elliptic KdV potential satisfying the constraints (1.16) and Q_p(B; τ) denotes the corresponding spectral polynomial, thereby extending the universal law proved for Darboux–Treibich–Verdier potentials.
Sponsor
References
Is there any analogue of the universal law (1.14) holding for this map? One can see that our approach does not work for the general elliptic KdV potentials, and this question remains open.
— Monodromy of generalized Lame equations with Darboux-Treibich-Verdier potentials: A universal law
(2404.01879 - Chen et al., 2 Apr 2024) in Section 1 (Introduction), after equation (1.17)