Analogous characterization for quantum vs randomized query complexity

Determine an analogue of the completion-complexity characterization that rules out superpolynomial quantum speedups in comparison to deterministic query complexity by developing a precise characterization for when the bounded-error quantum query complexity Q(f) is polynomially related to the bounded-error randomized query complexity R(f) for partial Boolean functions f.

Background

The paper proves that completion complexity characterizes when superpolynomial quantum speedups (over deterministic algorithms) are possible: D(f) is polynomially related to a measure M(f) if and only if M is extendable without superpolynomial blowup via a completion (Lemma/Result in the completions section).

An open direction is to obtain an analogous, necessary-and-sufficient criterion for the relationship between quantum and randomized query complexities, i.e., to understand when Q(f) and R(f) are polynomially related for partial functions via a completion-like framework.

References

We list some open problems that would further the usefulness of our techniques. Completion complexity characterizes the possibility of superpolynomial speedups in comparison to deterministic query complexity. What is the analogous characterization when comparing quantum to randomized query complexity?

From Promises to Totality: A Framework for Ruling Out Quantum Speedups  (2603.29256 - Huffstutler et al., 31 Mar 2026) in Discussion and further work (Introduction)