Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Adleman–Pomerance–Rumely conjecture on the maximal order constant for ω*(n)

Establish that there exist infinitely many integers n such that ω*(n) > exp(((log 2 + o(1))·log n)/(log log n)), where ω*(n) denotes the number of primes p for which p − 1 divides n. This upgrades the constant 1/2·log 2 appearing in Prachar’s GRH-conditional lower bound to log 2 and would be best possible in view of the maximal order of the divisor function.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The shifted-prime divisor function ω*(n) counts primes p with p−1 dividing n. Prachar obtained a GRH-conditional bound with constant (1/2)·log 2 in the exponent, while Adleman–Pomerance–Rumely (APR) established the same shape unconditionally with some unspecified constant. The conjecture seeks the optimal constant log 2 in the exponent for infinitely many n, matching the known upper bound for the divisor function τ(n).

Achieving log 2 would settle the maximal order question in the strongest possible form and has implications for the Carmichael function λ(n), connecting multiplicative group exponents to the distribution of shifted primes.

References

In particular, the conjecture of Adleman, Pomerance and Rumely mentioned in the introduction, that \begin{equation}\label{eq:APRconj} \omega{*}(n)\ge\exp\left(\left(\log 2+o(1)\right)\frac{\log{n}{\log\log{n}\right) \end{equation} for infinitely many $n$, would follow if eq:pi(x;d,1) holds for any fixed $\theta\in(0,1)$.

eq:APRconj:

ω(n)exp((log2+o(1))lognloglogn)\omega^{*}(n)\ge\exp\left(\left(\log 2+o(1)\right)\frac{\log{n}}{\log\log{n}}\right)

eq:pi(x;d,1):

π(x;d,1)xϕ(d)logx\pi(x;d,1)\gg\frac{x}{\phi(d)\log x}

The maximal order of the shifted-prime divisor function (2510.14167 - Fan et al., 15 Oct 2025) in Concluding remarks, Equation (APRconj)