Federation of Agents: A Semantics-Aware Communication Fabric for Large-Scale Agentic AI (2509.20175v1)
Abstract: We present Federation of Agents (FoA), a distributed orchestration framework that transforms static multi-agent coordination into dynamic, capability-driven collaboration. FoA introduces Versioned Capability Vectors (VCVs): machine-readable profiles that make agent capabilities searchable through semantic embeddings, enabling agents to advertise their capabilities, cost, and limitations. Our aarchitecturecombines three key innovations: (1) semantic routing that matches tasks to agents over sharded HNSW indices while enforcing operational constraints through cost-biased optimization, (2) dynamic task decomposition where compatible agents collaboratively break down complex tasks into DAGs of subtasks through consensus-based merging, and (3) smart clustering that groups agents working on similar subtasks into collaborative channels for k-round refinement before synthesis. Built on top of MQTT,s publish-subscribe semantics for scalable message passing, FoA achieves sub-linear complexity through hierarchical capability matching and efficient index maintenance. Evaluation on HealthBench shows 13x improvements over single-model baselines, with clustering-enhanced laboration particularly effective for complex reasoning tasks requiring multiple perspectives. The system scales horizontally while maintaining consistent performance, demonstrating that semantic orchestration with structured collaboration can unlock the collective intelligence of heterogeneous federations of AI agents.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Explain it Like I'm 14
What this paper is about
This paper introduces a system called “Federation of Agents” (FoA). Think of it like a smart teamwork platform for many different AI helpers. Instead of one big AI trying to do everything, FoA helps lots of specialized AIs find the right partners, talk to each other, split up big jobs, and combine their work—fast, safely, and within budget. The goal is to turn “who can do what, at what cost, under which rules?” into a searchable, automatic process.
What questions did the researchers ask?
- How can we quickly find the best AI agents for a task based on their actual skills, not just keywords?
- How do we break big, complicated tasks into sensible smaller steps and assign them to the right agents?
- How can agents collaborate effectively, refine their answers together, and then merge those into a final solution?
- How do we keep everything efficient, scalable, and compliant with rules (like privacy or safety) and limits (like time and cost)?
How did they build the system?
Agent profiles (Versioned Capability Vectors, or VCVs)
Each AI agent has a machine-readable “profile card” that includes:
- What it’s good at (skills and strengths)
- What resources it needs (like speed, memory, or energy)
- Which rules and policies it follows (permissions, safety labels)
- A summary of how it behaves (its “Spec,” turned into numbers)
- A version number (so updates are tracked over time)
In everyday terms, a VCV is like a resume that a computer can understand and search. The system turns each profile and task into numbers that capture meaning (this is called a “semantic embedding”), so it can find good matches based on meaning, not just keywords.
Finding the right helpers (semantic routing)
FoA uses a fast “nearest neighbor” search structure (called HNSW) that works like a city map with shortcuts: it can quickly find agents whose profiles are closest to the task’s requirements. It also checks:
- Policy fit: only agents allowed to handle a task can be selected
- Resource fit: agents with the right speed, memory, and cost are preferred
So routing is like matching the right crew to a job, while checking safety rules and the budget.
Breaking big tasks into smaller steps (dynamic task decomposition)
When a complicated task arrives, multiple compatible agents suggest ways to split it into smaller subtasks. FoA merges their suggestions into a DAG (a directed acyclic graph), which is like a recipe with steps and dependencies—some steps can run in parallel, others must wait for previous ones to finish.
Working in paper groups (smart clustering)
Agents assigned to the same subtask are grouped into small “paper groups” (clusters). They share drafts, critique each other, and refine their answers for a few rounds (k rounds). This is like a peer-review cycle: different perspectives improve the solution and reduce mistakes. When they agree, they send back a “task complete” result.
Messaging layer (MQTT)
All this coordination runs over MQTT, a lightweight publish/subscribe messaging system. Think of it like organized group chats with named channels:
- Agents “subscribe” to topics to receive messages
- The orchestrator “publishes” assignments and collects results MQTT is fast and works well even on constrained networks (like IoT devices).
What did they find?
On a tough healthcare benchmark (HealthBench Hard), FoA significantly outperformed single-model systems:
- About 13× better than the best single agent baseline
- The clustering (paper groups) especially helped on complex, high-stakes questions that benefit from multiple viewpoints
- The system scales horizontally (you can add more agents) while keeping performance steady
- The search and routing remain efficient thanks to the hierarchical index and smart maintenance, so finding the right agents gets faster as the system grows
Why this matters:
- Matching tasks to the right experts and letting them collaborate improves accuracy, completeness, and clarity—key needs in areas like healthcare
- Resource and policy checks help ensure safe, cost-effective, and rule-abiding operation
What does this mean for the future?
FoA is a step toward an “Internet of Agents,” where many specialized AIs can discover each other, team up, and solve complex problems together. This could:
- Boost results in fields that need careful reasoning and compliance (healthcare, industry, finance)
- Make it practical to combine many smaller, efficient models instead of relying on one giant, expensive model
- Encourage safer AI deployments through policy checks, audit trails, and collaboration that reduces errors
There are still challenges—like making the meaning-matching even better, forming the best groups every time, and strengthening defenses against bad actors—but the approach shows that smart orchestration plus structured collaboration can unlock “collective intelligence” across many different AI agents.
Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions
Below is a single, concrete list of what remains missing, uncertain, or unexplored in the paper—framed to guide actionable future research.
- VCV interoperability and standardization: lack of a concrete schema/ontology aligned with MCP or domain ontologies, version negotiation, and backward-compatibility guarantees across heterogeneous stacks.
- Quantitative contribution of VCV components: no ablations showing how capability embeddings, Bloom-filtered skills, resource vectors, policy flags, and spec embeddings individually affect routing quality and outcomes.
- Bloom filter reliability: unreported false-positive/false-negative rates for discrete skills and their impact on misrouting and assignment errors.
- Spec-embedding validity: unclear how cosine similarity over spec embeddings correlates with actual policy alignment or adherence; no calibration or evaluation methodology for “policy fit” as a similarity metric.
- Cold-start and exploration: no strategy for discovering/utilizing novel agents with sparse interaction history (e.g., active probing, bandit-based exploration, or confidence-aware routing).
- Assignment optimization tractability: unspecified solver, approximation guarantees, and scalability for the integer program under large k (subtasks) and n (agents); no fairness or anti-starvation constraints.
- Dynamic adaptation: absent online re-optimization policies under changing loads, agent dropouts, or shifting resource budgets (e.g., preemption, rebalancing, or anytime planning).
- Reputation system design: no definition of scoring, decay, aggregation, identity binding, or mitigation of gaming; no Sybil-resistant identity, staking, or rate-limiting mechanisms.
- Capability attestation and trust: no implemented mechanism to verify advertised capabilities (e.g., TEEs, attestation, proofs-of-execution); the trust model remains assumptive.
- Decomposition consensus: unspecified algorithm for merging agent-proposed DAGs (tie-breaking, conflict resolution, quality criteria), and no guarantees on minimality, correctness, or stability of the final task graph.
- Beyond DAG workflows: no support for iterative/cyclic or event-driven processes (feedback loops, monitoring tasks), nor policies for termination detection in non-DAG settings.
- Failure handling and reliability: missing guarantees and mechanisms for idempotency, exactly-once/effectively-once processing, retries, reassignments, and recovery after network partitions or broker outages.
- MQTT security posture: unaddressed details on authentication, authorization, topic-level ACLs, TLS/mTLS, multi-tenancy isolation, DDoS resistance, and broker federation to avoid single points of failure.
- Messaging limits and flow control: no handling of large artifacts (chunking/streaming), backpressure, rate control, or QoS trade-offs under high load and intermittent connectivity.
- Sub-linear complexity claims: no formal analysis or empirical scaling curves for end-to-end latency/throughput as agents and tasks scale; unaddressed HNSW sharding/rehashing, replication, and memory footprint.
- Index staleness and consistency: no bounds on Δ-gossip convergence, conflict resolution for concurrent VCV updates, or impact of staleness on routing accuracy.
- Cluster formation and convergence: no principled selection of k rounds or cluster sizes; missing ablations on accuracy–overhead trade-offs and stopping criteria robustness.
- Cross-cluster knowledge sharing: no protocol for safe, efficient information exchange between related clusters, nor privacy/permissioning models for inter-cluster data flow.
- Adversarial robustness: unaddressed defenses against capability misrepresentation, colluding clusters, prompt-injection via shared channels, and poisoning of shared drafts beyond sandboxing.
- Policy enforcement semantics: “p_s ⊆ p_a” lacks a formal policy language, runtime monitors, and auditable enforcement; cross-jurisdictional policy conflicts and provenance constraints are unspecified.
- Privacy of VCVs: no strategy for redacting sensitive fields in advertised capabilities/specs or for privacy-preserving similarity search (e.g., HE, PSI, or secure enclaves).
- Resource vector accuracy: no methodology for measuring/predicting latency/energy/memory under load, nor online calibration to prevent misestimation-driven misrouting.
- Cost–quality–latency trade-offs: absent quantification of compute/token budgets per task, marginal costs of clustering rounds, or carbon/energy accounting.
- Evaluation transparency: missing details on number and types of agents, model sizes, toolsets, token budgets, and hardware; no code/artifact release for reproducibility.
- Baseline clarity and significance: “13×” improvement lacks absolute baselines and human evaluation; reliance on a model-based grader may bias results; no statistical tests beyond bootstrap s.d.
- Domain and modality generalization: untested applicability beyond HealthBench (e.g., vision/speech/robotics), and no multimodal extension of VCVs or transport payloads.
- Tool-use governance: unspecified selection policies, error handling, and trust boundaries for external tools/APIs; no sandboxing or audit of tool outputs.
- Data governance and provenance: undefined artifact schemas, lineage capture, PII handling, and retention policies across organizational boundaries.
- Edge/federated scenarios: no empirical results under constrained networks (latency jitter, packet loss, battery), or QoS tuning for IoT deployments.
- Continuous learning: no mechanism for incorporating feedback to update agent policies and VCVs without catastrophic forgetting; unclear schedule and safety checks for online updates.
- Human-in-the-loop controls: no escalation policies, review checkpoints, or override mechanisms for high-stakes tasks (especially in healthcare).
- Economic incentives: absent pricing/market design for cost-biased routing and guardrails against quality “race-to-the-bottom” or strategic underbidding.
- Enterprise integration: migration path from topic-based to semantics-driven orchestration is unspecified; compatibility with legacy systems and governance processes is unclear.
- Broker federation: no design for multi-broker hierarchies, inter-broker routing, and cross-domain ACLs to support organizational federation at scale.
- Synthesis conflict resolution: unclear formal methods for reconciling contradictory subtask outputs (beyond meta-prompting), e.g., provenance-aware reasoning, confidence aggregation, or logic-based reconciliation.
Practical Applications
Immediate Applications
Below are concrete applications that can be deployed now by leveraging FoA’s Versioned Capability Vectors (VCVs), semantic routing over sharded HNSW indices, DAG-based dynamic decomposition, clustering-based refinement, and MQTT pub/sub transport.
Healthcare
- Clinical triage and second-opinion assistant (virtual front door)
- What: Route patient queries to specialized agents (e.g., differential diagnosis, red-flag detection, medication interactions), then cluster for k-round peer refinement before a clinician-facing synthesis.
- Tools/workflows: VCV registry with HIPAA/GDPR policy flags; MQTT topics per case; DAG nodes for history-taking, risk scoring, and referral recommendation; HealthBench-like grader for continuous QA.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Accurate healthcare embeddings; integration with EHR and identity systems; clinical oversight; auditable policy enforcement.
- Administrative and documentation copilot (EHR summarization, coding, prior auth)
- What: Decompose into subtasks (record retrieval, summarization, ICD/CPT mapping, payer rules check), assign to cost/policy-compliant agents, synthesize for clinician review.
- Tools/workflows: VCVs enumerating tool connectors (HL7/FHIR, payer APIs); policy-as-code gates; reputation-weighted agent selection.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Access to EHR/payer APIs; robust provenance logging; controlled PII handling.
Customer Service and Public Services
- Multi-LLM routing for contact centers and citizen portals
- What: Semantic routing of intents to specialized agents (billing, technical, legal), dynamic DAG for resolving multi-issue tickets, clustering to reduce hallucinations.
- Tools/workflows: Capability directory UI; cost-bias router; MQTT gateway integrated with CRM/ITSM.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Intent embeddings; SLAs and cost controls; data access controls per tenant.
Software Engineering and DevOps
- Code review and bug triage crews
- What: Assign PR files/subsystems to security/performance/readability agents; cluster critiques; synthesize actionable review with fix suggestions; DAG nodes integrate CI checks and static analysis.
- Tools/workflows: GitHub/GitLab app; VCVs reflecting repo/tool proficiencies; orchestrator plugin for CI.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Repository access; model/tool alignment to coding standards; developer-in-the-loop.
- Incident response runbooks
- What: Decompose incidents (detect, triage, mitigate, postmortem), route to on-call, SRE, security agents; MQTT topics as incident buses; cluster for root-cause hypotheses.
- Tools/workflows: SIEM/SOAR connectors in VCVs; policy guardrails for privileged actions.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Reliable telemetry; role-based access; change control integration.
Data/AI Engineering
- Federated RAG and ETL orchestration
- What: Dynamic DAGs across SQL/NoSQL/vector stores; capability-aware routing to data-connector agents with compliance labels; clustering for schema-mapping reconciliation.
- Tools/workflows: VCV-enriched data catalog; proof-of-provenance; cost-aware scheduling (latency/bandwidth).
- Assumptions/dependencies: Data silos connected; policy labels harmonized; HNSW index sized for catalog scale.
- Multi-model selection and serving (MLOps)
- What: Route prompts/jobs across heterogeneous models by task, cost, and policy; record performance in reputations; fallback and A/B harness built into DAG.
- Tools/workflows: Model registry with VCVs; router SDK; inference gateways with MQTT bridge.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Consistent evaluation metrics; budget governance; drift monitoring.
IoT and Industry 4.0
- Predictive maintenance and anomaly triage at the edge
- What: MQTT-native event routing to capability-matched diagnostic agents on gateways; clusters propose root-cause and next-best-action; DAG coordinates work orders.
- Tools/workflows: Unified Namespace; VCVs include sensor coverage, latency, power constraints.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Stable MQTT infra; model footprints fit edge; safety policies encoded and enforced.
Finance and Risk
- KYC/AML alert triage crews
- What: Decompose alerts into data gathering, rule cross-checking, narrative construction; route by jurisdictional policy flags; cluster for risk-scoring consensus.
- Tools/workflows: Case management integration; VCVs encoding regional regulations; provenance to satisfy audit trails.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Access to internal/external data sources; regulator-aligned templates.
Knowledge Management and Education
- Enterprise Q&A with domain-specialist agents
- What: Route questions to legal/HR/engineering agents with policy compliance; cluster refinements; synthesized, cited answers.
- Tools/workflows: VCV-backed enterprise tool/connectors; quality gates; admin console for capability updates.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Up-to-date corpora; access controls; citation verification.
- Personalized paper-plan builder and tutor
- What: Decompose learning goals into modules; route by subject-level capability vectors; cluster for curriculum coverage; synthesize adaptive plans.
- Tools/workflows: LMS/LXP integration; age/region policy flags in VCVs; offline MQTT for classrooms.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Curricula mapping; safety filters; teacher oversight.
Robotics and Operations
- Fleet task allocation with cost/policy constraints
- What: Use VCVs with payload, battery, sensors, geofences; semantic routing for task-to-robot matching; DAG for multi-robot missions.
- Tools/workflows: MQTT control bus; orchestration UI; safety interlocks as policy flags.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Real-time telemetry; certified safety envelopes; reliable localization.
Long-Term Applications
These applications require further research, scaling, standardization, or regulatory clearance. Many build on FoA’s future directions: adaptive RL routing, cross-cluster knowledge sharing, verifiable attestations, and tighter security.
Cross-Organization Ecosystems
- Internet-scale capability marketplace and broker
- What: Interoperable VCV standard; market of agent capabilities with billing, SLAs, and reputation portability across orgs.
- Tools/workflows: Capability registry service; payment and metering; SLA/verifiability APIs.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Standardized VCV ontology and MCP-over-MQTT adoption; legal/commercial frameworks; anti-fraud.
- Supply chain orchestration across tiers
- What: Policy-guarded DAGs spanning suppliers/logistics; semantically route planning/scheduling subtasks across private enclaves.
- Tools/workflows: Federation gateways; TEEs for data joins; cross-org provenance ledger.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Trust fabric (PKI, attestations); harmonized taxonomies; contract-level data sharing.
Safety-Critical Autonomy
- Hospital-grade decision support and care pathway orchestration
- What: Verified task routing + cluster consensus integrated into clinical workflows; explainable synthesis; continuous post-market surveillance.
- Tools/workflows: Validated medical ontologies in VCVs; safety cases; human-on-the-loop governance.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Regulatory approval; robust calibration; red-teaming and bias audits.
- Autonomous grid and energy market balancing
- What: Agents optimize dispatch, demand response, and microgrid coordination with tight latency/energy policies.
- Tools/workflows: Real-time MQTT mesh; policy engines for regulatory constraints; verifiable actuation logs.
- Assumptions/dependencies: High-fidelity forecasting; fail-safe controls; cyber resilience.
- Urban emergency response and multi-agency incident management
- What: DAGs spanning detection, triage, logistics, public comms; dynamic routing across agency-specific policies; offline-first ops.
- Tools/workflows: Inter-agency capability registry; crisis-grade MQTT; joint playbooks.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Legal data-sharing; drills and certification; adversarial robustness.
Advanced Agent Intelligence
- Adaptive reinforcement-learned router and clusterer
- What: RL controllers that tune thresholds, cost-biasing, and cluster sizes from live feedback and SLAs.
- Tools/workflows: Reward shaping with task success and cost; safe exploration constraints.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Reliable feedback signals; safe online learning.
- Cross-cluster knowledge sharing and distillation
- What: Share artifacts between clusters working on related subtasks; distill collective insights into new capabilities.
- Tools/workflows: Artifact registries; conflict-resolution protocols; knowledge grafting.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Scalable comms without chatter; IP and privacy controls.
- Federated learning integrated into FoA
- What: VCVs include FL/DP capabilities; DAG nodes for train/aggregate cycles; on-device personalization.
- Tools/workflows: Secure aggregation; DP budget tracking; update provenance.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Device resources; privacy guarantees; model heterogeneity management.
Trust, Security, and Governance
- Verifiable capability attestations (ZKPs/TEEs) and anti-Sybil reputation
- What: Cryptographic proof that agents possess claimed tools/data; robust identity and Sybil resistance.
- Tools/workflows: TEE-backed VCV signing; decentralized reputation; anomaly detection.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Attestation infra; hardware roots of trust; governance for reputation.
- Policy simulation and impact assessment for regulators
- What: Orchestrate heterogeneous models/datasets to simulate policy outcomes; explainable, auditable workflows.
- Tools/workflows: Scenario DAGs; bias/uncertainty reporting; archival provenance graphs.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Access to representative data; oversight boards; standardized reporting.
Sector-Specific Horizons
- UAV swarms and autonomous logistics
- What: VCVs encode avionics/sensor payloads/airspace permissions; semantic mission allocation; cross-swarm knowledge exchange.
- Tools/workflows: Beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations; deconfliction policies.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Airspace integration; safety certification; strong comms.
- Enterprise Agentic RPA 2.0
- What: Workforce of interoperable agents advertising capabilities to automate end-to-end business processes with dynamic DAGs.
- Tools/workflows: Process mining to seed VCVs; policy-as-code compliance; human checkpoints.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Change management; control-plane security; organizational buy-in.
- Home “personal OS” across devices
- What: Household agents (calendar, shopping, HVAC, security) federate via home MQTT; local-first privacy with selective cloud delegation.
- Tools/workflows: Capability directory on the gateway; family policy profiles; device attestation.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Consumer-grade orchestration UI; standard device VCVs; privacy defaults.
- Scientific discovery pipelines
- What: Cross-lab hypothesis generation, data collection, simulation, and analysis orchestrated via FoA with reproducible provenance trails.
- Tools/workflows: Capability registry for instruments/simulators; DAG notebooks; credit assignment via reputation.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Interop across institutions; data licensing; method registries.
Notes on Feasibility and Dependencies
- Technical: Quality of embeddings (cold-start risk), accurate policy labels, reliable MQTT infrastructure (QoS, security), index scaling (sharded HNSW), cluster size constraints (communication overhead), and robust observability/telemetry.
- Organizational: Data-access governance, standardization of VCV schemas and ontologies, procurement/legal frameworks for cross-org federation, and human oversight in safety-critical contexts.
- Security: Capability misrepresentation risks, need for identity/attestation, defense against Sybil/adversarial behaviors, sandboxing, and policy-as-code enforcement.
- Cost and Performance: Budget-aware routing requires real-time cost/latency telemetry; edge deployments depend on model footprint and energy constraints.
These applications map FoA’s core contributions—VCVs, semantic/cost-aware routing, collaborative DAG decomposition, and MQTT-based clustering—into deployable solutions today and into ambitious but attainable systems with further research and standardization.
Glossary
- Agent-0 (A-0): The central orchestrator responsible for decomposition, routing, clustering, and synthesis. "We call the orchestrator of the federation Agent-0 (A-0)."
- Agent-1 (A-1): Worker agents that execute assigned subtasks and participate in collaborative refinement. "Each Agent-1 (A-1) is wrapped around a pre-aligned LLM using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)."
- Agentic AI: AI systems composed of multiple coordinated agents that plan, reason, and act over extended horizons. "This shift toward agentic AI systems represents a fundamental change in how we approach complex problem-solving with AI"
- Binary assignment matrix: A matrix of 0/1 variables mapping subtasks to agents under constraints. "Agent-0 computes an optimal binary assignment matrix "
- Bloom filter: A space-efficient probabilistic data structure for set membership. " is a Bloom filter over discrete skills"
- CAFEIN: CERN’s federated AI platform enabling privacy-preserving, cross-institution orchestration. "infrastructures such as CAFEIN\textsuperscript{\textregistered}, CERN's federated AI platform"
- Capability embedding: A dense vector representing an agent’s core competencies in semantic space. " is a dense capability embedding describing the agent's core competencies"
- Chain-of-thought: The guided internal reasoning steps used during synthesis. "by steering the internal chain-of-thought of A-0"
- Cold-start problem: The issue where new or unseen capabilities are underutilized due to limited data. "creating a cold-start problem where agents with novel capabilities may remain underutilized"
- Consensus mechanism: A process to merge multiple agent proposals into a single agreed structure. "merges them via a consensus mechanism"
- Consensus signal: A termination signal within a cluster indicating agreement to stop refinement. "refinement continues for rounds or until a consensus signal is triggered"
- Constrained optimization: Optimization under resource, policy, and capacity constraints to generate execution plans. "The orchestrator then transforms these compatibility scores into a concrete execution plan through constrained optimization."
- Cosine similarity: A similarity measure between normalized vectors used for spec alignment. " after -normalization"
- DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph): A graph of subtasks with no cycles encoding execution dependencies. "merges them into a consensual directed acyclic graph DAG"
- Delta-gossip protocol: A lightweight gossip approach that exchanges only changes (deltas) between nodes. "It also runs a lightweight -gossip protocol to propagate VCV updates"
- Differential privacy: A method to protect individual data contributions during training or aggregation. "storing model-update and differential-privacy parameters in VCVs"
- Federated learning (FL): Decentralized training across nodes without sharing raw data. "This is distinct from federated learning (FL), which concerns privacy-preserving model training."
- GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization): A policy optimization method used to align agent behavior. "using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO)"
- HealthBench Hard: An open-ended healthcare benchmark for evaluating agent responses. "We evaluate the FoA framework on OpenAI's HealthBench Hard"
- Helpful, Honest, Harmless (HHH) criteria: Alignment standards for safe and trustworthy AI assistants. "the helpful, honest, harmless (HHH) criteria"
- Hierarchical clustering: A clustering technique used to group agents by similarity for collaborative refinement. "Hierarchical clustering on this matrix yields clusters "
- Hierarchical navigable small world (HNSW): A graph-based index enabling fast, approximate nearest-neighbor search. "We index VCVs using a sharded Hierarchical navigable small world (HNSW) index"
- Indicator function: A function that enforces policy constraints by zeroing incompatible assignments. "the indicator ensures policy compliance (required permissions are within the agent's authorization set )"
- Integer program: An optimization problem with integer variables used for agent-subtask assignment. "Solving the resulting integer program yields an assignment matrix "
- Internet of Agents: A vision of interoperable, networked AI agents coordinating at internet scale. "preventing the realization of the \"Internet of Agents\" vision"
- k-round refinement: A bounded number of collaborative review iterations within a cluster. "into collaborative channels for -round refinement before synthesis."
- MCP (Model Context Protocol): A protocol standardizing tools-to-model interfaces and capability schemas. "compatible with emerging interoperability efforts (e.g., Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based capability schemas)"
- Medgemma: A medical-domain baseline model used for comparison in experiments. "best single agent baseline (Medgemma~\cite{sellergren2025medgemma})"
- Meta-prompting: A strategy of using prompts to guide higher-level synthesis operations. "We implement SYNTH via meta-prompting"
- MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport): A lightweight publish/subscribe protocol for scalable agent communication. "the Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) protocol provides efficient, reliable delivery under constrained networks"
- Policy-as-code enforcement: Encoded policies that are automatically enforced across workflows. "including auditable provenance trails and policy-as-code enforcement"
- Policy compliance flags: Binary labels indicating an agent’s permissions and regulatory status. " encodes policy compliance flags"
- Publish/subscribe semantics: Asynchronous many-to-many messaging pattern used for agent coordination. "Built on top of MQTT's publish-subscribe semantics for scalable message passing"
- Quality of Service (QoS) guarantees: Transport-level delivery assurances for messaging in distributed systems. "The protocol's inherent support for Quality of Service guarantees, retained messages, and wildcard subscriptions"
- Retained messages: Broker-held messages that persist for new subscribers. "retained messages"
- Reputation-weighted aggregation: A voting mechanism that weights contributions by agent reputation. "using simple majority voting or reputation-weighted aggregation to decide which components to adopt."
- RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback): Technique to align models using human-preference data. "Recent work on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) shows that LLMs can be fine-tuned to follow such instructions"
- Semantic embeddings: Dense representations of text enabling similarity-based search and routing. "searchable through semantic embeddings"
- Semantic routing: Task-to-agent matching based on embedding similarity and constraints. "FoA applies semantic routing that couples profiles' similarities with policy checks and resource budgets"
- Server-Sent Events (SSE): HTTP-based streaming mechanism used by some MCP implementations. "most of the MCP implementations currently rely on HTTP and Server-Sent Events"
- Sharded HNSW index: Partitioned HNSW indices enabling scalable, sublinear capability matching. "maintains a sharded HNSW index over VCV embeddings to support sub-linear retrieval at scale."
- Smart clustering: Protocols that group similar agents for collaborative refinement while managing overhead. "smart clustering that groups agents working on similar subtasks into collaborative channels"
- Spec (Specification): A machine-readable document of goals, tools, rules, and principles guiding an agent. "Each agent is associated with a model specification, or Spec"
- Spec embedding: The vectorized representation of an agent’s specification used in routing and alignment. " is the spec embedding described above"
- Sub-linear complexity: Complexity that grows slower than linearly with system size, enabling scalability. "FoA achieves sub-linear complexity through hierarchical capability matching and efficient index maintenance."
- Sybil networks: Coordinated adversarial identities used to subvert trust and reputation systems. "such as coordinated Sybil networks"
- SYNTH operator: The synthesis step that combines predecessor results and refined answers. "it invokes the SYNTH operator to combine the results"
- Topological order: An execution ordering that respects dependency constraints in a DAG. "by traversing it in topological order"
- Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs): Secure hardware enclaves for verifiable execution and attestation. "trusted execution environments"
- Unified Namespace (UNS): A semantic topic hierarchy for interoperable addressing in MQTT systems. "Unified namespace (UNS) patterns leverage MQTT's topic hierarchy to create a semantic addressing scheme"
- VCVs (Versioned Capability Vectors): Versioned, machine-readable capability profiles for agents. "FoA introduces Versioned Capability Vectors (VCVs): machine-readable profiles"
- Wildcard subscriptions: Topic filters that subscribe to multiple MQTT topics using wildcards. "wildcard subscriptions"
- Zero-knowledge proof systems: Cryptographic methods to prove statements without revealing underlying data. "zero-knowledge proof systems"
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.