Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 157 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 218 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Breaking the Trend: How to Avoid Cherry-Picked Signals (2504.10914v2)

Published 15 Apr 2025 in q-fin.PM

Abstract: Our empirical results, illustrated in Fig.5, show an impressive fit with the pretty complex theoritical Sharpe formula of a Trend following strategy depending on the parameter of the signal, which was derived by Grebenkov and Serror (2014). That empirical fit convinces us that a mean-reversion process with only one time scale is enough to model, in a pretty precise way, the reality of the trend-following mechanism at the average scale of CTAs and as a consequence, using only one simple EMA, appears optimal to capture the trend. As a consequence, using a complex basket of different complex indicators as signal, do not seem to be so rational or optimal and exposes to the risk of cherry-picking.

Summary

Breaking the Trend: How to Avoid Cherry-Picked Signals

The paper "Breaking the Trend: How to Avoid Cherry-Picked Signals" by Sebastien Valeyre provides a critical examination of trend-following strategies within the context of Commodity Trading Advisors (CTAs). The author challenges the conventional wisdom of using a blend of various technical indicators, suggesting that a simpler approach using a single Exponential Moving Average (EMA) may be more effective. This paper leverages the theoretical insights provided by Grebenkov's model to empirically validate the utility of EMA in trend-following strategies.

Empirical Validation of Grebenkov's Model

Valeyre focuses on the optimization problem tackled by Grebenkov, highlighting an elegant formula for the theoretical Sharpe ratio of trend-following strategies. Grebenkov's work suggests that portfolio positions should linearly depend on signals, specifically on the EMA of returns. This diverges from the traditional binary choice of long/short positions. The empirical results presented in the paper align closely with Grebenkov's theoretical predictions, using parameters such as λ=1180\lambda = \frac{1}{180} and β0=0.12\beta_0 = 0.12 to achieve an optimal Sharpe ratio. The author finds that a single EMA using a 112-day time scale is optimal, challenging traditional methods that employ multiple complex indicators.

Implications for Trend-Following Strategy

Valeyre's analysis suggests that a simplified strategy using a single time-scale EMA is not only adequate but preferable. This is a salient point given the inherent complexity and potential pitfalls of using multiple indicators, such as exposure to cherry-picking. The findings implicate that market trends can be sufficiently captured by modeling them as mean-reversion processes with a singular time scale, rather than relying on multi-time scale approaches.

Critique of Multi-Indicator Approaches

The paper critiques the juxtaposition of complex indicator suites against the simplicity of the EMA. Valeyre posits that using a complex arrangement of indicators poses unnecessary risks, given the robust performance of a singular EMA. By validating Grebenkov's theoretical model with empirical data, the paper highlights that existing market strategies might overcomplicate trend-following to their detriment. The emphasis on simplicity could lead CTAs to reevaluate their signal construction methodologies.

Potential for Future Research

While the paper strongly supports the use of a single EMA, the potential role of shorter time scales is acknowledged, although deemed significantly less impactful on medium-frequency strategies. This raises questions about the practical application of short-term signals and calls for further investigation into their specific utility within a broader trading strategy framework. Additionally, the strong correlation between indicators with varying parameters invites exploration into underlying factors that drive these correlations, which might point to common market influences or psychological factors in trading behavior.

Conclusion

Valeyre's paper makes a compelling case for rethinking trend-following strategies, encouraging a pivot towards simplicity and rigorous empirical validation over traditional diversity of signals. By corroborating Grebenkov's model with empirical evidence, Valeyre demonstrates the efficacy and elegance of employing a singular EMA-based approach, offering a streamlined alternative to signal construction for CTAs. As a result, the paper sets the stage for further exploration into optimizing trend-following methodologies within financial markets.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 19 tweets and received 1584 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: