Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 93 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 97 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 194 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Review of Case-Based Reasoning for LLM Agents: Theoretical Foundations, Architectural Components, and Cognitive Integration (2504.06943v2)

Published 9 Apr 2025 in cs.AI and cs.MA

Abstract: Agents powered by LLMs have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities in various tasks. Still, they face limitations in tasks requiring specific, structured knowledge, flexibility, or accountable decision-making. While agents are capable of perceiving their environments, forming inferences, planning, and executing actions towards goals, they often face issues such as hallucinations and lack of contextual memory across interactions. This paper explores how Case-Based Reasoning (CBR), a strategy that solves new problems by referencing past experiences, can be integrated into LLM agent frameworks. This integration allows LLMs to leverage explicit knowledge, enhancing their effectiveness. We systematically review the theoretical foundations of these enhanced agents, identify critical framework components, and formulate a mathematical model for the CBR processes of case retrieval, adaptation, and learning. We also evaluate CBR-enhanced agents against other methods like Chain-of-Thought reasoning and standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation, analyzing their relative strengths. Moreover, we explore how leveraging CBR's cognitive dimensions (including self-reflection, introspection, and curiosity) via goal-driven autonomy mechanisms can further enhance the LLM agent capabilities. Contributing to the ongoing research on neuro-symbolic hybrid systems, this work posits CBR as a viable technique for enhancing the reasoning skills and cognitive aspects of autonomous LLM agents.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that integrating case-based reasoning into LLM agents improves transparency and contextual memory by retrieving and adapting structured past experiences.
  • The paper presents a mathematical framework optimizing case retrieval, adaptation, and learning through semantic embeddings and feature-based indices.
  • The paper discusses challenges in case acquisition and dynamic integration while outlining future directions for cognitive enhancement and goal-driven autonomy.

Review of Case-Based Reasoning for LLM Agents: Theoretical Foundations, Architectural Components, and Cognitive Integration

Introduction

The paper "Review of Case-Based Reasoning for LLM Agents: Theoretical Foundations, Architectural Components, and Cognitive Integration" explores the intersection of Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and LLMs within autonomous agents. It examines how CBR can address known limitations in LLM agents, such as hallucinations and lack of contextual memory, by leveraging explicit, structured knowledge from past experiences. The work aims to improve reasoning capabilities and transparency by integrating cognitive dimensions like self-reflection and goal-driven autonomy.

Theoretical Foundations

The integration of CBR within LLM agents involves representing cases as structured knowledge units encompassing problem characteristics, solutions, outcomes, and metadata. The paper provides a mathematical framework for the CBR processes of retrieval, adaptation, and learning, where retrieval is formulated as an optimization problem based on semantic similarities in the LLM's embedding space. Adaptation involves transforming retrieved solutions to fit new problems using the LLM's generative capabilities, while learning involves selectively retaining cases based on utility assessments.

Architectural Components

Key architectural elements include sophisticated case representation schemes that combine semantic embeddings and feature-based indices, hybrid retrieval mechanisms balancing semantic and feature-based searches, and advanced adaptation processes, such as transformational and generative adaptation. The integration of CBR with the LLM reasoning process involves a weighted combination of case-based reasoning and parametric inference from the LLM, leveraging the strengths of each.

Cognitive Dimensions and Goal-Driven Autonomy

The cognitive dimensions of CBR—self-reflection, introspection, and curiosity—are explored as mechanisms to deepen the agent's understanding and problem-solving capabilities. Self-reflection aids in context understanding and domain insight, introspection aids in understanding retrieval and adaptation failures, and curiosity drives knowledge expansion through active exploration. Additionally, incorporating Goal-Driven Autonomy (GDA) allows agents to dynamically generate and manage goals, enhancing adaptability in dynamic environments.

Comparative Analysis

CBR-augmented LLM agents are compared against Chain-of-Thought reasoning and standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation. CBR agents exhibit unique strengths in reasoning transparency, domain adaptation, and cognitive capabilities. The explicit precedent-based reasoning of CBR provides enhanced explainability and trustworthiness. In adaptive performance, CBR agents can quickly align solutions to domain-specific tasks due to their efficient case acquisition and learning mechanisms.

Implementation Challenges and Future Directions

Implementing CBR within LLM agents presents challenges such as case acquisition, balancing computational resources, designing integration architectures, and maintaining dynamic case bases. Future research directions include developing advanced case representation methods, improving retrieval and adaptation mechanisms, and exploring the potential of CBR in driving more complex cognitive behaviors in AI systems. Furthermore, there is a call for improved evaluation frameworks to properly assess the capabilities of CBR-enhanced systems and their ethical implications.

Conclusion

The paper presents a promising framework for enhancing LLM agents through Case-Based Reasoning, offering improvements in reasoning accuracy, transparency, and adaptability. By bridging symbolic and neural approaches, this integration exemplifies how experiential knowledge can complement the distributional semantics of LLMs. The integration of cognitive dimensions and goal-driven techniques positions these agents for robust performance in complex, real-world applications. Future innovations in meta-cognition, cross-domain knowledge transfer, and dynamic goal management will likely advance the potential and applicability of CBR-enhanced LLM agents in various fields.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube