Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
51 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Multi-Dimensional Insights: Benchmarking Real-World Personalization in Large Multimodal Models (2412.12606v1)

Published 17 Dec 2024 in cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.CV
Multi-Dimensional Insights: Benchmarking Real-World Personalization in Large Multimodal Models

Abstract: The rapidly developing field of large multimodal models (LMMs) has led to the emergence of diverse models with remarkable capabilities. However, existing benchmarks fail to comprehensively, objectively and accurately evaluate whether LMMs align with the diverse needs of humans in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose the Multi-Dimensional Insights (MDI) benchmark, which includes over 500 images covering six common scenarios of human life. Notably, the MDI-Benchmark offers two significant advantages over existing evaluations: (1) Each image is accompanied by two types of questions: simple questions to assess the model's understanding of the image, and complex questions to evaluate the model's ability to analyze and reason beyond basic content. (2) Recognizing that people of different age groups have varying needs and perspectives when faced with the same scenario, our benchmark stratifies questions into three age categories: young people, middle-aged people, and older people. This design allows for a detailed assessment of LMMs' capabilities in meeting the preferences and needs of different age groups. With MDI-Benchmark, the strong model like GPT-4o achieve 79% accuracy on age-related tasks, indicating that existing LMMs still have considerable room for improvement in addressing real-world applications. Looking ahead, we anticipate that the MDI-Benchmark will open new pathways for aligning real-world personalization in LMMs. The MDI-Benchmark data and evaluation code are available at https://mdi-benchmark.github.io/

Analyzing the Multi-Dimensional Insights Benchmark for Large Multimodal Models

The research paper "Multi-Dimensional Insights: Benchmarking Real-World Personalization in Large Multimodal Models" presents an important development in the evaluation of large multimodal models (LMMs). Traditional benchmarks insufficiently evaluate LMMs' capabilities to address the diverse and personalized needs of individuals across real-world scenarios. This paper introduces the Multi-Dimensional Insights (MDI) Benchmark, designed to fill this gap by providing comprehensive evaluations based on real-world images and inquiries that address varying complexities and age-related preferences.

Core Contributions and Structure of MDI Benchmark

The MDI Benchmark is unique due to its focus on both problem complexity and age stratification across various scenarios. It comprises over 500 images and 1,200 human-curated questions, spanning six key life scenarios: Architecture, Education, Housework, Social Services, Sport, and Transport. Each area is further detailed into subdomains, permitting a nuanced stratification:

  1. Question Complexity: Questions are categorized into two levels. Level 1 addresses basic image extraction tasks such as object detection and OCR, while Level 2 involves more sophisticated tasks requiring logical reasoning, calculations, and the application of domain-specific knowledge.
  2. Age Stratification: Questions are tailored to reflect the varying needs of different age groups: young, middle-aged, and older individuals. This stratification highlights age-related differences in priorities and cognitive capabilities when interacting with AI systems.

Evaluation and Results

The evaluation involved 14 leading LMMs, both open-source and closed-source. The GPT-4o model distinguished itself with superior performance across various age groups and problem complexities, indicating a robust capability to handle diverse and personalized real-world requirements. The research reveals substantial variance in model performance, particularly when comparing Level 1 and Level 2 tasks, suggesting that LMMs still face significant challenges in complex reasoning tasks.

Additionally, open-source models demonstrated a scaling phenomenon where larger models performed better, but interestingly, they showed room for improvement compared to their closed-source counterparts. This highlights the potential for future refinement in model architecture and training strategies to better align with human requirements.

Implications and Future Directions

Practically, the MDI Benchmark provides a robust tool for assessing the utility and adaptability of LMMs in real-world applications, particularly in developing personalized AI systems. It uncovers notable challenges in age-specific interactions with AI, an area ripe for exploration in developing more nuanced personalization algorithms.

Theoretically, this work underscores essential aspects of AGI development: the need for systems to comprehend and cater to the multifaceted nature of human demands. The benchmark encourages more focused research into the balance of generalization and specialization in multimodal models, particularly to enhance reasoning and knowledge-application tasks.

Moving forward, the development of advanced LMMs that can uniformly address diverse personal needs across different contexts remains critical. Future research could benefit from integrating adaptive learning techniques and dynamic knowledge retrieval mechanisms, ensuring that these models do not only recognize but also prioritize contextually relevant information, significantly enhancing their real-world applicability.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (13)
  1. Yifan Zhang (245 papers)
  2. Shanglin Lei (5 papers)
  3. Runqi Qiao (5 papers)
  4. Zhuoma GongQue (7 papers)
  5. Xiaoshuai Song (16 papers)
  6. Guanting Dong (46 papers)
  7. Qiuna Tan (3 papers)
  8. Zhe Wei (4 papers)
  9. Peiqing Yang (9 papers)
  10. Ye Tian (190 papers)
  11. Yadong Xue (7 papers)
  12. Xiaofei Wang (138 papers)
  13. Honggang Zhang (108 papers)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com