Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 81 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 32 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 99 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis? (2412.02906v1)

Published 3 Dec 2024 in cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: LLMs have made significant strides at code generation through improved model design, training, and chain-of-thought. However, prompt-level optimizations remain an important yet under-explored aspect of LLMs for coding. This work focuses on the few-shot examples present in most code generation prompts, offering a systematic study on whether few-shot examples improve LLM's coding capabilities, which few-shot examples have the largest impact, and how to select impactful examples. Our work offers 2 approaches for selecting few-shot examples, a model-free method, CODEEXEMPLAR-FREE, and a model-based method, CODEEXEMPLAR-BASED. The 2 methods offer a trade-off between improved performance and reliance on training data and interpretability. Both methods significantly improve CodeLlama's coding ability across the popular HumanEval+ coding benchmark. In summary, our work provides valuable insights into how to pick few-shot examples in code generation prompts to improve LLM code generation capabilities.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that few-shot learning integration significantly enhances code synthesis in LLMs.
  • It introduces two novel selection algorithms—CODE EXEMPLAR-FREE and CODE EXEMPLAR-BASE—for efficient prompt optimization.
  • Empirical evaluations on models like CODE LLAMA show improved Pass@1 scores with strategically curated examples.

Insights into Few-Shot Learning: Enhancements in LLM Code Synthesis

The paper, "Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis?" explores the integration of few-shot learning within LLMs, specifically in the field of code generation. The authors aim to address a critical facet of LLM operation: whether the inclusion of few-shot examples within prompts measurably contributes to enhanced code synthesis. Given the prevalent use of LLMs across varied domains—from natural language processing to software engineering—this research explores a pivotal question: can enhancing prompt strategies augment LLM capabilities without changing the model architecture or training dataset?

The authors put forth two innovative algorithms for selecting few-shot examples: a model-free method called CODE EXEMPLAR-FREE and a model-based approach denoted as CODE EXEMPLAR-BASE. The model-free method selects examples based solely on input metrics without requiring additional training, making it interpretable and efficient for deployment within constrained data environments. On the other hand, the model-based method leverages a fine-tuned neural network trained on a substantial dataset of code-generating prompts, offering superior performance by more accurately estimating the potential impact of each example.

Empirical evaluations, conducted on a range of LLMs such as T5-SMALL, T5-BASE, MISTRAL, LLAMA, and CODE LLAMA, emphasize the significance of few-shot example selection. The experiments reveal that careful selection and integration of such examples can lead to notable improvements in code generation capability, as measured by the Pass@1 scoring metric on the HUMAN EVAL+ benchmark. The choice of examples profoundly influences LLM performance, with triads of examples yielding the best performance gains when thoughtfully curated as opposed to arbitrary selections. In particular, CODE LLAMA benefits greatly from these methodologies, illustrating that strategic prompt optimization holds substantial potential across different LLM architectures.

In exploring methodology, the paper fully embraces a robust experimental design. The authors dissect prompt templates into distinct components—natural language descriptions and input-output examples—to unequivocally delineate their respective contributions to performance improvements. Furthermore, the paper uncovers a pertinent insight: examples that are more complex and less predictable to the model tend to yield superior enhancements, a revelation supported by analyses of perplexity metrics.

Highlighting the implications, this work denotes significant advancements for the development and deployment of LLMs in coding tasks. By shifting focus towards optimizing the prompt rather than modifying the model itself, the paper provides a computationally efficient avenue to harness the potential of LLMs more fully. This opens up potential modifications or enhancements in conventional approaches to few-shot learning and suggests broader applications beyond software engineering, where similar strategies might significantly improve the adaptability and effectiveness of LLMs across domains.

In summary, this systematic investigation into prompt-based optimizations underscores a practical dimension to LLM improvements through considered few-shot learning. Future pathways may involve augmenting such methods with larger, more diverse datasets and extending the application to other AI domains, positing the intriguing question of how far prompt optimization alone can push the boundaries of LLM performance.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 posts and received 11 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube