Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 81 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 231 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 435 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 33 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Testing the Wineland Criterion with Finite Statistics (2410.23741v2)

Published 31 Oct 2024 in quant-ph

Abstract: The Wineland parameter aims at detecting metrologically useful entangled states, called spin-squeezed states, from expectations and variances of total angular momenta. {However, efficient strategies for estimating this parameter in practice have yet to be determined and in particular, the effects of a finite number of measurements remain insufficiently addressed. We formulate the detection of spin squeezing as a hypothesis-testing problem, where the null hypothesis assumes that the experimental data can be explained by non-spin-squeezed states. Within this framework, we derive upper and lower bounds on the p-value to quantify the statistical evidence against the null hypothesis.} By applying our statistical test to data obtained in multiple experiments, we are unable to reject the hypothesis that non-spin squeezed states were measured with a p-value of 5\% or less in most cases. We also find an explicit non-spin squeezed state according to the Wineland parameter reproducing most of the observed results with a p-value exceeding 5\%. More generally, our results provide a rigorous method to establish robust statistical evidence of spin squeezing from the Wineland parameter in future experiments,accounting for finite statistics.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (7)
  1. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004).
  2. V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photon. 5, 222 (2011).
  3. M. W. Mitchell, J. S. Lundeen, and A. M. Steinberg, Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state, Nature 429, 161 (2004).
  4. M. H. Schleier-Smith, I. D. Leroux, and V. Vuletić, States of an ensemble of two-level atoms with reduced quantum uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073604 (2010).
  5. I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuletić, Implementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073602 (2010).
  6. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138 (1993).
  7. L.-M. Duan, Many-particle entanglement with bose–einstein condensates, Nature 409, 63 (2001).

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 2 posts and received 4 likes.