Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 34 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 115 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 40 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Contactless seismocardiography via Gunnar-Farneback optical flow (2408.09512v1)

Published 18 Aug 2024 in physics.med-ph and eess.IV

Abstract: Seismocardiography (SCG) has gained significant attention due to its potential applications in monitoring cardiac health and diagnosing cardiovascular conditions. Conventional SCG methods rely on accelerometers attached to the chest, which can be uncomfortable or inconvenient. In recent years, researchers have explored non-contact methods to capture SCG signals, and one promising approach involves analyzing video recordings of the chest. In this study, we investigate a vision-based method based on the Gunnar-Farneback optical flow to extract SCG signals from the chest skin movements recorded by a smartphone camera. We compared the SCG signals extracted from the chest videos of four healthy subjects with those obtained from accelerometers and our previous method based on sticker tracking. Our results demonstrated that the vision-based SCG signals extracted by the proposed method closely resembled those from accelerometers and stickers, although these signals were captured from slightly different locations. The mean squared error between the vision-based SCG signals and accelerometer-based signals was found to be within a reasonable range, especially between signals on head-to-foot direction (0.2$<$MSE$<$1.5). Additionally, heart rates derived from the vision-based SCG exhibited good agreement with the gold-standard ECG measurements, with a mean difference of 0.8 bpm. These results indicate the potential of this non-invasive method in health monitoring and diagnostics.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com