Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 98 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 58 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 112 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 165 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 29 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

When time delays and phase lags are not the same: higher-order phase reduction unravels delay-induced synchronization in oscillator networks (2404.11340v1)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in math.DS, nlin.AO, and nlin.CD

Abstract: Coupled oscillators with time-delayed network interactions are critical to understand synchronization phenomena in many physical systems. Phase reductions to finite-dimensional phase oscillator networks allow for their explicit analysis. However, first-order phase reductions - where delays correspond to phase lags - fail to capture the delay-dependence of synchronization. We develop a systematic approach to derive phase reductions for delay-coupled oscillators to arbitrary order. Already the second-order reduction can predict delay-dependent (bi-)stability of synchronized states as demonstrated for Stuart-Landau oscillators.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. D. Pazó and E. Montbrió, Phys Rev Lett 116, 238101 (2016).
  2. I. Z. Kiss, Curr Opin Chem Eng 21, 1 (2018).
  3. H. Nakao, Contemp Phys 57, 188 (2016).
  4. P. Ashwin, S. Coombes, and R. Nicks, J Math Neurosci 6, 2 (2016).
  5. B. Pietras and A. Daffertshofer, Phys Rep 819, 1 (2019).
  6. H. Sakaguchi and Y. Kuramoto, Prog Theor Phys 76, 576 (1986).
  7. L. A. Smirnov and A. Pikovsky, arXiv:2307.12563  (2023).
  8. N. Fenichel, Indiana U Math J 21, 193 (1972).
  9. P. W. Bates, K. Lu, and C. Zeng, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (1998).
  10. E. M. Izhikevich, Phys Rev E 58, 905 (1998).
  11. S. von der Gracht, E. Nijholt, and B. Rink, arXiv:2306.03320  (2023).
  12. C. Bick, B. Rink, and B. de Wolff, arXiv  (2024).
  13. E. M. Izhikevich, SIAM J Appl Math 60, 1789 (2000).
  14. C. Bick, T. Böhle, and C. Kuehn, arXiv:2305.04277  (2023a).
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 15 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube