Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 61 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 129 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 474 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Consistency analysis of refined instrumental variable methods for continuous-time system identification in closed-loop (2404.08955v1)

Published 13 Apr 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Refined instrumental variable methods have been broadly used for identification of continuous-time systems in both open and closed-loop settings. However, the theoretical properties of these methods are still yet to be fully understood when operating in closed-loop. In this paper, we address the consistency of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems (SRIVC) and its closed-loop variant CLSRIVC when they are applied on data that is generated from a feedback loop. In particular, we consider feedback loops consisting of continuous-time controllers, as well as the discrete-time control case. This paper proves that the SRIVC and CLSRIVC estimators are not generically consistent when there is a continuous-time controller in the loop, and that generic consistency can be achieved when the controller is implemented in discrete-time. Numerical simulations are presented to support the theoretical results.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. K. J. Åström. Introduction to Stochastic Control Theory. Academic Press, 1970.
  2. Lectures on dynamic systems and control. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
  3. A bias-eliminated least-squares method for continuous-time model identification of closed-loop systems. International Journal of Control, 73(1):38–48, 2000.
  4. H. Garnier and L. Wang (Eds.). Identification of Continuous-time Models from Sampled Data. Springer, 2008.
  5. H. Garnier and P. C. Young. The advantages of directly identifying continuous-time transfer function models in practical applications. International Journal of Control, 87(7):1319–1338, 2014.
  6. M. Gilson and H. Garnier. Continuous-time model identification of systems operating in closed-loop. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 36(16):405–410, 2003.
  7. Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop continuous-time model identification. In H. Garnier and L. Wang (Eds.). Identification of Continuous-time Models from Sampled Data, pages 133–160. Springer, 2008.
  8. Optimal instrumental variable method for closed-loop identification. IET Control Theory & Applications, 5(10):1147–1154, 2011.
  9. Instrumental variable methods for closed-loop system identification. Automatica, 41(2):241–249, 2005.
  10. Consistent identification of continuous-time systems under multisine input signal excitation. Automatica, 133, Article 109859, 2020.
  11. The SRIVC algorithm for continuous-time system identification with arbitrary input excitation in open and closed loop. In 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3004–3009, 2021.
  12. Refined instrumental variable methods for unstable continuous-time systems in closed-loop. International Journal of Control, pages 1–15, 2022.
  13. Control System Design. Prentice Hall, 2001.
  14. Bias issues in closed loop identification with application to adaptive control. Communications in Information and Systems, 2(4):349–370, 2002.
  15. Refined instrumental variable methods for identifying Hammerstein models operating in closed loop. In Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3614–3619, 2009.
  16. E. L. Lehmann and G. Casella. Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd Edition. Springer, 1998.
  17. Closed-loop identification of systems using hybrid Box–Jenkins structure and its application to PID tuning. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 23(12):1997–2004, 2015.
  18. L. Ljung. System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall, 1999.
  19. B. S. Mityagin. The zero set of a real analytic function. Matematicheskie Zametki, 107(3):473–475, 2020.
  20. Consistency analysis of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems. Automatica, 113, Article 108767, 2020.
  21. Efficiency analysis of the simplified refined instrumental variable method for continuous-time systems. Automatica, 121, Article 109196, 2020.
  22. T. Söderström. Ergodicity results for sample covariances. Problems of Control and Information Theory, 4(2):131–138, 1975.
  23. T. Söderström and P. Stoica. Instrumental Variable Methods for System Identification. Springer, 1983.
  24. T. Söderström and P. Stoica. On the generic consistency of instrumental variable estimates. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 17(2):603–607, 1984.
  25. T. Söderström and P. Stoica. System Identification. Prentice-Hall, 1989.
  26. Closed-loop continuous-time model identification with noisy input-output. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1):12853–12858, 2017.
  27. Finite sample properties of indirect nonparametric closed-loop identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic control, 47(8):1277–1292, 2002.
  28. P. C. Young. The refined instrumental variable method. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 42(2-3):149–179, 2008.
  29. P. C. Young. A three stage refined IV algorithm for closed loop identification and estimation. Technical Report TR/210a, Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, 2009.
  30. P. C. Young. Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis: An Introduction for the Student and Practitioner, 2nd Edition. Springer, 2012.
  31. Simple refined IV methods of closed-loop system identification. In 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint Malo, France, pages 1151–1156, 2009.
  32. Refined instrumental variable methods of recursive time-series analysis. Part III, Extensions. International Journal of Control, 31(4):741–764, 1980.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up