Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 152 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 199 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 430 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Evaluating Authoring Tools with the Explorable Authoring Requirements (2403.17714v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Explorables with interactive, multimodal content, openly available on the web, are a promising medium for education. Yet authoring such explorables requires web development expertise, excluding most educators and students from the authoring and remixing process. Some tools are available to reduce this barrier of entry and others are in development, making a method to evaluate these new tools necessary. On the basis of the software quality model ISO 25010, empirical results, and domain modeling, we derive the Explorable Authoring Requirements (EAR) as a requirements catalogue explorable authoring tools should implement. We then outline a future research design to operationalize EAR.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Alexander Bogner, Beate Littig and Wolfgang Menz “Interviewing experts” Springer, 2009 URL: https://books.google.de/books?hl=en&lr=&id=m5SGDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=expert+interview&ots=RItRXfT5zd&sig=5wtvwDALKrOqIG5cwrzPK3aKRF8
  2. Cynthia J. Brame “Effective Educational Videos: Principles and Guidelines for Maximizing Student Learning from Video Content” In CBE—Life Sciences Education 15.4, 2016, pp. es6 DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
  3. john Brooke “SUS: A ’Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale” Num Pages: 6 In Usability Evaluation In Industry CRC Press, 1996
  4. “Idyll Studio: A Structured Editor for Authoring Interactive & Data-Driven Articles” In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’21 New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 1–12 DOI: 10.1145/3472749.3474731
  5. Paula Escudeiro, José Bidarra and Nuno Escudeiro “Evaluating educational software” In IMSCI 2009. 3rd International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics, 2009 URL: https://repositorioaberto.uab.pt/handle/10400.2/14593
  6. “Developer experience: Concept and definition” In 2012 international conference on software and system process (ICSSP) IEEE, 2012, pp. 73–77 URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6225984/?casa_token=NoNHmr5kMaAAAAAA:sB-w4ViIveKAEKTdeDuAvL6yFp2t_T9h-FJpgTv37WsD4RMAKoPIAN7e1W8twceYMuZvPKeQ
  7. Marijn Haverbeke “Eloquent JavaScript: a modern introduction to programming” San Francisco: No Starch Press, 2019
  8. “Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire” In Computer Standards & Interfaces 65, 2019, pp. 38–44 DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2019.01.007
  9. “Communicating with Interactive Articles” In Distill 5.9, 2020, pp. e28 DOI: 10.23915/distill.00028
  10. International Standards Organization and International Electrotechnical Commission “ISO/IEC 25010:2011” In ISO, 2011 URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html
  11. “Contexts for evaluating educational software” Publisher: Oxford University Press Oxford, UK In Interacting with computers 11.5, 1999, pp. 499–516 URL: https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-abstract/11/5/499/776800
  12. “Thinking about thinking aloud: A comparison of two verbal protocols for usability testing” Publisher: IEEE In IEEE transactions on professional communication 47.2, 2004, pp. 105–117 URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1303808/?casa_token=SklmTmCIAd8AAAAA:QXAtJcxV3OcNfk9oF2mCk_2pRLwNtxueijc1iC2OWHmyw2ecREVjYlTs8dXldT6f-RFOay1b
  13. James R. Lewis “Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies” In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 14.3-4, 2002, pp. 463–488 DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2002.9669130
  14. James R. Lewis “IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use” In International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7.1, 1995, pp. 57–78 DOI: 10.1080/10447319509526110
  15. Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held and Martin Schrepp “Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire” Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science In HCI and Usability for Education and Work 5298 Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 63–76 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6
  16. “Evaluation of the Nomological Validity of Cognitive, Emotional, and Behavioral Factors for the Measurement of Developer Experience” In Applied Sciences 11.17, 2021, pp. 7805 DOI: 10.3390/app11177805
  17. Richard E. Mayer “Multimedia learning” OCLC: ocn228676642 Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009
  18. Philipp Mayring “Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution” Publisher: AUT, 2014 URL: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/39517/ssoar-2014-mayring-Qualitative_content_analysis_theoretical_foundation.pdf
  19. Morten Moshagen and Meinald T. Thielsch “Facets of visual aesthetics” Publisher: Elsevier In International journal of human-computer studies 68.10, 2010, pp. 689–709 URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581910000777?casa_token=tEYFZzxqWYEAAAAA:yF1U9q680LPRZQnonIgUAb7eULtw0QOXozup7QH_yr7oa4rBAw0VSQPPuq2ruREnE0eZBo6qgw
  20. Jöran Muuß-Merholz “Freie Unterrichtsmaterialien finden, rechtssicher einsetzen, selbst machen und teilen” Weinheim Basel: Beltz, 2018
  21. Frederick F. Reichheld “The one number you need to grow” In Harvard business review 81.12, 2003, pp. 46–55 URL: https://www.nashc.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/the-one-number-you-need-to-know.pdf
  22. Martin Schrepp “Measuring User Experience with Modular Questionnaires” ISSN: 2330-4588 In 2021 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2021, pp. 1–6 DOI: 10.1109/ICACSIS53237.2021.9631321
  23. Jeff Sauro and Joseph S. Dumas “Comparison of three one-question, post-task usability questionnaires” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Boston MA USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 1599–1608 DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1518946
  24. “Evaluating Digital Worksheets with Interactive Programming Exercises for K-12 Education” In undefined, 2019 URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Evaluating-Digital-Worksheets-with-Interactive-for-Serth-Teusner/b942f38e8d0a5b8c1055e3e883efb9f3139bb9c4
  25. Ian Sommerville “Software engineering” OCLC: ocn462909026 Boston: Pearson, 2011
  26. Frederic Salmen, Rene Roepke and Ulrik Schroeder “WebWriter: A System to Author and Remix Explorables–Requirements & First Prototype” Publisher: Gesellschaft für Informatik eV, 2023 URL: https://dl.gi.de/items/7cc913e1-f35c-400f-b6e5-5f667830e374
  27. Atikah Shemshack and Jonathan Michael Spector “A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms” In Smart Learning Environments 7.1, 2020, pp. 33 DOI: 10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
  28. Bret Victor “Explorable Explanations”, 2011 URL: http://worrydream.com/ExplorableExplanations/
  29. “Software Quality Models in Practice Survey Results”, 2012
  30. Carl E. Wieman, Wendy K. Adams and Katherine K. Perkins “PhET: Simulations That Enhance Learning” Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science In Science 322.5902, 2008, pp. 682–683 DOI: 10.1126/science.1161948
  31. “A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games.” In Journal of Educational Psychology 105.2, 2013, pp. 249–265 DOI: 10.1037/a0031311

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: