Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Varroa destructor detection on honey bees using hyperspectral imagery

Published 21 Mar 2024 in cs.CV and cs.LG | (2403.14359v1)

Abstract: Hyperspectral (HS) imagery in agriculture is becoming increasingly common. These images have the advantage of higher spectral resolution. Advanced spectral processing techniques are required to unlock the information potential in these HS images. The present paper introduces a method rooted in multivariate statistics designed to detect parasitic Varroa destructor mites on the body of western honey bee Apis mellifera, enabling easier and continuous monitoring of the bee hives. The methodology explores unsupervised (K-means++) and recently developed supervised (Kernel Flows - Partial Least-Squares, KF-PLS) methods for parasitic identification. Additionally, in light of the emergence of custom-band multispectral cameras, the present research outlines a strategy for identifying the specific wavelengths necessary for effective bee-mite separation, suitable for implementation in a custom-band camera. Illustrated with a real-case dataset, our findings demonstrate that as few as four spectral bands are sufficient for accurate parasite identification.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Impact of varroa destructor and associated pathologies on the colony collapse disorder affecting honey bees, Research in veterinary science 135 (2021) 85–95.
  2. N. Eliash, A. Mikheyev, Varroa mite evolution: a neglected aspect of worldwide bee collapses?, Current opinion in insect science 39 (2020) 21–26.
  3. C. J. Jack, J. D. Ellis, Integrated pest management control of varroa destructor (acari: Varroidae), the most damaging pest of (apis mellifera l.(hymenoptera: Apidae)) colonies, Journal of Insect Science 21 (2021) 6.
  4. Biology and management of varroa destructor (mesostigmata: Varroidae) in apis mellifera (hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies, Journal of Integrated Pest Management 11 (2020) 1.
  5. A. König, Varroacounter–towards automating the varroa screening for alleviated bee hive treatment, in: SEIA’2019 Conference Proceedings, 2020, pp. 244–247.
  6. A computer vision system to monitor the infestation level of varroa destructor in a honeybee colony, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 164 (2019) 104898. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169918310329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104898.
  7. Monitoring of varroa infestation rate in beehives: A simple ai approach, in: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2022, pp. 3341–3345. doi:10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9897809.
  8. Visual diagnosis of the varroa destructor parasitic mite in honeybees using object detector techniques, Sensors 21 (2021) 2764.
  9. Detection of varroa destructor infestation of honeybees based on segmentation and object detection convolutional neural networks, AgriEngineering 5 (2023) 1644–1662.
  10. Machine learning and computer vision techniques in continuous beehive monitoring applications: A survey, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 217 (2024) 108560. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169923009481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108560.
  11. Automated, non-invasive varroa mite detection by vibrational measurements of gait combined with machine learning, Scientific Reports 13 (2023) 10202.
  12. Honey bee sound classification using spectrogram image features, in: 2022 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON), IEEE, 2022, pp. 205–209.
  13. Recent advances of hyperspectral imaging technology and applications in agriculture, Remote Sensing 12 (2020) 2659.
  14. A systematic review on hyperspectral imaging technology with a machine and deep learning methodology for agricultural applications, Ecological Informatics 69 (2022) 101678.
  15. 3d-printed fluorescence hyperspectral lidar for monitoring tagged insects, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 28 (2022) 1–9.
  16. A. Bjorgan, L. L. Randeberg, Real-time noise removal for line-scanning hyperspectral devices using a minimum noise fraction-based approach, Sensors 15 (2015) 3362–3378.
  17. C. Rodarmel, J. Shan, Principal component analysis for hyperspectral image classification, Surveying and Land Information Science 62 (2002) 115–122.
  18. Improving scalable k-means++, Algorithms 14 (2020) 6.
  19. Kf-pls: Optimizing kernel partial least-squares (k-pls) with kernel flows, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.06547 (2023).
  20. S. De Jong, Simpls: an alternative approach to partial least squares regression, Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems 18 (1993) 251–263.
  21. S.-P. Reinikainen, A. Höskuldsson, Covproc method: strategy in modeling dynamic systems, Journal of Chemometrics: A Journal of the Chemometrics Society 17 (2003) 130–139.
  22. An overview of variable selection methods in multivariate analysis of near-infrared spectra, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 113 (2019) 102–115.
  23. Specim iq: Evaluation of a new, miniaturized handheld hyperspectral camera and its application for plant phenotyping and disease detection, Sensors 18 (2018). URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/2/441. doi:10.3390/s18020441.
  24. T. Zemčík, K. Horak, On hyperspectral analysis of water soluble writing inks, in: PROCEEDINGS II OF THE 28TH STUDENT EEICT 2023 Selected Papers, 2023, pp. 237–242. doi:10.13164/eeict.2023.237.
  25. Colorimetric similarity evaluation methodology for heterogeneous rock surfaces using digital imaging, Journal of Cultural Heritage 64 (2023) 244–254.
  26. R. Rosipal, L. J. Trejo, Kernel partial least squares regression in reproducing kernel hilbert space, Journal of machine learning research 2 (2001) 97–123.
  27. Formulating distance functions via the kernel trick, in: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery in data mining, 2005, pp. 703–709.
  28. R. D. Cook, L. Forzani, Pls regression algorithms in the presence of nonlinearity, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 213 (2021) 104307.
  29. H. Owhadi, G. R. Yoo, Kernel flows: From learning kernels from data into the abyss, Journal of Computational Physics 389 (2019) 22–47.
  30. R. M. Balabin, S. V. Smirnov, Variable selection in near-infrared spectroscopy: benchmarking of feature selection methods on biodiesel data, Analytica chimica acta 692 (2011) 63–72.
  31. S.-P. Reinikainen, A. Höskuldsson, Multivariate statistical analysis of a multi-step industrial processes, Analytica chimica acta 595 (2007) 248–256.
  32. Raspberry pi bee health monitoring device, in: Proceedings I of the 29th Student EEICT 2023, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, 2023, pp. 226–230.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that hyperspectral imaging combined with advanced clustering methods enables accurate detection of Varroa mites on honey bees.
  • Methodology includes unsupervised (K-means++) and supervised (KF-PLS) clustering, leveraging PCA and wavelength selection to reduce spectral bands.
  • Implications include developing cost-effective monitoring systems for bee colony health and aiding early detection of Colony Collapse Disorder.

Varroa Destructor Detection on Honey Bees Using Hyperspectral Imagery

Introduction

The paper "Varroa destructor detection on honey bees using hyperspectral imagery" investigates the application of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) for identifying Varroa destructor mites on the body of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. The study focuses on developing spectral processing techniques to differentiate these mites from bees using multivariate statistical methods, including unsupervised clustering with K-means++ and supervised clustering with Kernel Flows - Partial Least-Squares (KF-PLS). The paper outlines the potential for enhanced monitoring of bee hives and identifies critical wavelengths necessary for effective bee-mite separation, with applications for custom-band multispectral cameras. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Bees mixed-up with detritus.

Methodology

Hyperspectral Imaging Setup

The research employs a Specim IQ portable hyperspectral camera for image acquisition, utilizing a multispectral unit with LEDs covering the spectral range of 400 nm to 1000 nm. Images are collected and processed to extract spectral signatures for clustering and classification purposes. Figure 2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Used Specim IQ camera.

Mathematical Techniques

The study leverages Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for spectral data decomposition, selecting components highly correlated with bee-mite discrimination variables for spectral reconstruction. K-means++ is used for unsupervised clustering, employing spectral profiles for efficient cluster identification. For supervised clustering, KF-PLS utilizes kernel projections in a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space to handle non-linear relationships in the spectral data.

Wavelength Selection

Two PLS-based methods are used for selecting discriminative wavelengths: an R2R^2-based method and a modified Covariance Procedure (COVPROC). These methods reduce the wavelength set from 204 bands to those essential for discrimination between bees and Varroa mites.

Results

The research demonstrates that four spectral bands are sufficient for accurate parasite identification. Unsuspected clustering methods demand spectral pre-processing, with K-means++ requiring projection from highly correlated PCA components. KF-PLS provides efficient discrimination with lower preprocessing needs. The identified wavelengths critical for bee-mite separation include bands around 492.97 nm and 796.74 nm, aligning partly with prior multispectral studies, but identifying discrepancies that could lead to improved methodologies. Figure 3

Figure 3: Cluster formation workflow.

Discussion

This study marks the first application of hyperspectral imaging for Varroa mite detection. It identifies specific spectral bands crucial for discrimination, posing significant implications for real-time hive monitoring. The findings could enable the development of systems utilizing monochromatic illumination for routine hive assessments. Future work will expand dataset diversity and methodology to include broader detritus analysis and refine spectral discrimination techniques.

Conclusion

The paper illustrates the potential for hyperspectral imagery in bee colony health monitoring, outlining effective clustering techniques for Varroa mite identification. By identifying essential wavelengths for discrimination, the study provides insights that can be applied in developing cost-effective monitoring systems, contributing to global efforts in managing bee health and addressing Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD).

References

The paper's innovation and methodologies are supported by extensive references in hyperspectral imaging, multivariate statistics, and bee health monitoring literature, acknowledging advancements in spectral analysis and computational techniques. The discussion encourages further exploration into real-time monitoring capabilities and potential improvements in hive health assessments using hyperspectral technologies.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.