Human-Robot Interaction and Perceived Irrationality: A Study of Trust Dynamics and Error Acknowledgment
Abstract: As robots become increasingly integrated into various industries, understanding how humans respond to robotic failures is critical. This study systematically examines trust dynamics and system design by analyzing human reactions to robot failures. We conducted a four-stage survey to explore how trust evolves throughout human-robot interactions. The first stage collected demographic data and initial trust levels. The second stage focused on preliminary expectations and perceptions of robotic capabilities. The third stage examined interaction details, including robot precision and error acknowledgment. Finally, the fourth stage assessed post-interaction perceptions, evaluating trust dynamics, forgiveness, and willingness to recommend robotic technologies. Results indicate that trust in robotic systems significantly increased when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations. Additionally, participants showed greater willingness to suggest robots for future tasks, highlighting the importance of direct engagement in shaping trust dynamics. These findings provide valuable insights for designing more transparent, responsive, and trustworthy robotic systems. By enhancing our understanding of human-robot interaction (HRI), this study contributes to the development of robotic technologies that foster greater public acceptance and adoption.
- H. Su, W. Qi, J. Chen, C. Yang, J. Sandoval, and M. A. Laribi, “Recent advancements in multimodal human–robot interaction,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 17, 2023.
- A. M. Aroyo, J. de Bruyne, O. Dheu, E. Fosch-Villaronga, A. Gudkov, H. Hoch, S. Jones, C. Lutz, H. Sætra, M. Solberg, and A. Tamò-Larrieux, “Overtrusting robots: Setting a research agenda to mitigate overtrust in automation,” Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 423–436, 2021.
- N. Mirnig, G. Stollnberger, M. Miksch, S. Stadler, M. Giuliani, and M. Tscheligi, “To err is robot: How humans assess and act toward an erroneous social robot,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 4, 2017.
- A. Weidemann and N. Rußwinkel, “The role of frustration in human–robot interaction – what is needed for a successful collaboration?,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, 2021.
- D. Kontogiorgos, M. Tran, J. Gustafson, and M. Soleymani, “A systematic cross-corpus analysis of human reactions to robot conversational failures,” ICMI ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 2021.
- H. Yasuda and M. Matsumoto, “Psychological impact on human when a robot makes mistakes,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration, pp. 335–339, 2013.
- M. L. Traeger, “Robots that admit mistakes foster better conversation in humans.” Yale News, March 2020.
- R. Salek Shahrezaie, B. Akter Anima, and D. Feil-Seifer, “Human and robot bonding: A study on implying homophily in hri,” UNR, 2020.
- C. J. Hayes, M. Moosaei, and L. D. Riek, “Exploring implicit human responses to robot mistakes in a learning from demonstration task,” in 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, Aug. 2016.
- M. Salem, G. Lakatos, F. Amirabdollahian, and K. Dautenhahn, “Would you trust a (faulty) robot? effects of error, task type and personality on human-robot cooperation and trust,” in Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’15, (New York, NY, USA), p. 141–148, Association for Computing Machinery, 2015.
- M. Stiber and C.-M. Huang, “Not all errors are created equal: Exploring human responses to robot errors with varying severity,” in Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI ’20 Companion, (New York, NY, USA), p. 97–101, Association for Computing Machinery, 2021.
- “Nao configuaration,” 2023.
- R. Bevans, “One-way anova — when and how to use it (with examples),” March 2020.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.