Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Gedanken Experiments to Destroy a Black Hole by a Test Particle: Multiply Charged Black Hole with Higher Derivative Corrections (2403.11488v1)

Published 18 Mar 2024 in hep-th and gr-qc

Abstract: We investigate a gedanken experiment to destroy an extremally charged black hole by dropping a test particle, provided that there are multiple $U(1)$ gauge fields coupled with each other through higher derivative interactions. In the absence of higher derivative corrections, it is known that the Coulomb repulsion prevents a test particle that would break the extremal condition from falling into an extremal black hole and therefore the black hole cannot be destroyed. We extend this observation to include higher derivative corrections. Although the extremal condition is modified by the higher derivative interactions, we find that the repulsive force induced by the higher derivative couplings is responsible for preventing a test particle that would break the modified extremal condition to reach the event horizon. Thus, we confirm that the weak cosmic censorship conjecture holds for extremally charged black holes even in the presence of higher derivative corrections, as long as the test particle approximation is justified.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1, 252 (1969).
  2. R. Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole, Annals Phys. 82, 548 (1974).
  3. T. Needham, COSMIC CENSORSHIP AND TEST PARTICLES, Phys. Rev. D 22, 791 (1980).
  4. I. Semiz, Dyon black holes do not violate cosmic censorship, Class. Quant. Grav. 7, 353 (1990).
  5. J. D. Bekenstein and C. Rosenzweig, Stability of the black hole horizon and the Landau ghost, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7239 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9406024 .
  6. I. Semiz, Dyonic Kerr-Newman black holes, complex scalar field and cosmic censorship, Gen. Rel. Grav. 43, 833 (2011), arXiv:gr-qc/0508011 .
  7. I. T. Drummond and S. J. Hathrell, QED Vacuum Polarization in a Background Gravitational Field and Its Effect on the Velocity of Photons, Phys. Rev. D 22, 343 (1980).
  8. Y. Kats, L. Motl, and M. Padi, Higher-order corrections to mass-charge relation of extremal black holes, JHEP 12, 068, arXiv:hep-th/0606100 .
  9. C. Cheung, J. Liu, and G. N. Remmen, Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy, JHEP 10, 004, arXiv:1801.08546 [hep-th] .
  10. Y. Hamada, T. Noumi, and G. Shiu, Weak Gravity Conjecture from Unitarity and Causality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 051601 (2019), arXiv:1810.03637 [hep-th] .
  11. C. R. T. Jones and B. McPeak, The Black Hole Weak Gravity Conjecture with Multiple Charges, JHEP 06, 140, arXiv:1908.10452 [hep-th] .
  12. B. Leaute and B. Linet, Selfinteraction of a point charge in the Kerr space-time, J. Phys. A 15, 1821 (1982).
  13. J. Sorce and R. M. Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole. II. Kerr-Newman black holes cannot be overcharged or overspun, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104014 (2017), arXiv:1707.05862 [gr-qc] .
  14. J. Jiang, Static charged Gauss-Bonnet black holes cannot be overcharged by the new version of gedanken experiments, Phys. Lett. B 804, 135365 (2020), arXiv:1912.10826 [gr-qc] .
  15. X.-Y. Wang and J. Jiang, Gedanken experiments at high-order approximation: nearly extremal Reissner-Nordström black holes cannot be overcharged, JHEP 05, 161, arXiv:2004.12120 [hep-th] .
  16. A. Sang and J. Jiang, Gedanken experiments at high-order approximation: Kerr black hole cannot be overspun, JHEP 09, 095, arXiv:2108.03454 [gr-qc] .
  17. X.-Y. Wang and J. Jiang, Gedanken experiments at high-order approximations: Kerr-Newman black hole cannot be overcharged and overspun, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064050 (2022).
  18. J. Jiang, A. Sang, and M. Zhang, Comment on ”Constraints on Low-Energy Effective Theories from Weak Cosmic Censorship”,   (2021), arXiv:2101.10172 [gr-qc] .
  19. F.-L. Lin, B. Ning, and Y. Chen, Weak cosmic censorship and the second law of black hole thermodynamics in higher derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D 108, 044025 (2023), arXiv:2211.17225 [hep-th] .
  20. K. Izumi, Causal Structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044037 (2014), arXiv:1406.0677 [gr-qc] .
  21. H. Reall, N. Tanahashi, and B. Way, Causality and Hyperbolicity of Lovelock Theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 205005 (2014), arXiv:1406.3379 [hep-th] .
  22. H. S. Reall, Causality in gravitational theories with second order equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D 103, 084027 (2021), arXiv:2101.11623 [gr-qc] .
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com