Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Shrinkage MMSE estimators of covariances beyond the zero-mean and stationary variance assumptions (2403.07104v2)

Published 11 Mar 2024 in astro-ph.IM and stat.ME

Abstract: We tackle covariance estimation in low-sample scenarios, employing a structured covariance matrix with shrinkage methods. These involve convexly combining a low-bias/high-variance empirical estimate with a biased regularization estimator, striking a bias-variance trade-off. Literature provides optimal settings of the regularization amount through risk minimization between the true covariance and its shrunk counterpart. Such estimators were derived for zero-mean statistics with i.i.d. diagonal regularization matrices accounting for the average sample variance solely. We extend these results to regularization matrices accounting for the sample variances both for centered and non-centered samples. In the latter case, the empirical estimate of the true mean is incorporated into our shrinkage estimators. Introducing confidence weights into the statistics also enhance estimator robustness against outliers. We compare our estimators to other shrinkage methods both on numerical simulations and on real data to solve a detection problem in astronomy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. O. Ledoit and M. Wolf, “Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection,” Journal of empirical finance, vol. 10, no. 5, 2003.
  2. J. Schäfer and K. Strimmer, “A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics,” Stat. appl. genet. mol., vol. 4, no. 1, 2005.
  3. G. Vasile et al., “Coherency matrix estimation of heterogeneous clutter in high-resolution polarimetric sar images,” IEEE TG, vol. 48, no. 4, 2009.
  4. R. A. Maronna et al., Robust statistics: theory and methods (with R).
  5. Y. Chen, A. Wiesel, Y.C. Eldar, and A.O. Hero, “Shrinkage algorithms for MMSE covariance estimation,” IEEE TSP, 2010.
  6. O. Ledoit and M. Wolf, “Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix,” UPF economics and business working paper, no. 691, 2003.
  7. ——, “A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices,” Journal of multivariate analysis, vol. 88, no. 2, 2004.
  8. L. Pueyo, “Direct imaging as a detection technique for exoplanets,” Handbook of Exoplanets, 2018.
  9. O. Flasseur et al., “Robustness to bad frames in angular differential imaging: a local weighting approach,” A&A, vol. 634, no. A2, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.