Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

RLPeri: Accelerating Visual Perimetry Test with Reinforcement Learning and Convolutional Feature Extraction

Published 8 Mar 2024 in cs.AI | (2403.05112v1)

Abstract: Visual perimetry is an important eye examination that helps detect vision problems caused by ocular or neurological conditions. During the test, a patient's gaze is fixed at a specific location while light stimuli of varying intensities are presented in central and peripheral vision. Based on the patient's responses to the stimuli, the visual field mapping and sensitivity are determined. However, maintaining high levels of concentration throughout the test can be challenging for patients, leading to increased examination times and decreased accuracy. In this work, we present RLPeri, a reinforcement learning-based approach to optimize visual perimetry testing. By determining the optimal sequence of locations and initial stimulus values, we aim to reduce the examination time without compromising accuracy. Additionally, we incorporate reward shaping techniques to further improve the testing performance. To monitor the patient's responses over time during testing, we represent the test's state as a pair of 3D matrices. We apply two different convolutional kernels to extract spatial features across locations as well as features across different stimulus values for each location. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our approach results in a 10-20% reduction in examination time while maintaining the accuracy as compared to state-of-the-art methods. With the presented approach, we aim to make visual perimetry testing more efficient and patient-friendly, while still providing accurate results.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (34)
  1. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 76(4): 431–437.
  2. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 76(2): 165–169.
  3. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 75(4): 368–375.
  4. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 40(3): 648–656.
  5. Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 55(5): 3265–3274.
  6. Podnet: Pooled outputs distillation for small-tasks incremental learning. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XX 16, 86–102. Springer.
  7. Optimizing structure–function relationship by maximizing correspondence between glaucomatous visual fields and mathematical retinal nerve fiber models. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 55(4): 2350–2357.
  8. A new SITA perimetric threshold testing algorithm: construction and a multicenter clinical study. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 198: 154–165.
  9. Henson. 1993. Visual Fields. In Visual Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.
  11. A history of perimetry and visual field testing. Optometry and Vision Science, 88(1): E8–E15.
  12. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision research, 34(7): 885–912.
  13. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  14. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25.
  15. Patient-attentive sequential strategy for perimetry-based visual field acquisition. Medical image analysis, 54: 179–192.
  16. Sequentially optimized reconstruction strategy: A meta-strategy for perimetry testing. Plos one, 12(10): e0185049.
  17. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature, 518(7540): 529–533.
  18. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology, 107(1): 134–142.
  19. Policy invariance under reward transformations: Theory and application to reward shaping. In Icml, volume 99, 278–287.
  20. Theory and application to reward shaping. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning.
  21. Visual field prediction using recurrent neural network. Scientific reports, 9(1): 1–12.
  22. Viability of performing multiple 24-2 visual field examinations at the same clinical visit: the Frontloading Fields Study (FFS). American Journal of Ophthalmology, 230: 48–59.
  23. Visual field digest. In A guide to perimetry and the Ocotpus perimeter, volume 7, chapter 2. Haag-Streit AG.
  24. Learning to Drive a Bicycle Using Reinforcement Learning and Shaping. In ICML, volume 98, 463–471. Citeseer.
  25. Incorporating spatial models in visual field test procedures. Translational vision science & technology, 5(2): 7–7.
  26. Can Artificial Intelligence Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression? A Spatial–Ordinal Convolutional Neural Network Model. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 233: 124–134.
  27. Reinforcement learning: an introduction MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, 22447.
  28. Action branching architectures for deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 32.
  29. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology, 121(11): 2081–2090.
  30. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 43(2): 322–331.
  31. Efficient feature transformations for discriminative and generative continual learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 13865–13875.
  32. Q-learning. Machine learning, 8(3): 279–292.
  33. The topographical relationship between optic disc and visual field in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica, 68(5): 568–574.
  34. Spatial entropy pursuit for fast and accurate perimetry testing. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 58(9): 3414–3424.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Paper to Video (Beta)

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.