Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Reappraisal of SU(3)-flavor breaking in $B\rightarrow DP$

Published 7 Mar 2024 in hep-ph and hep-ex | (2403.04878v2)

Abstract: In light of recently found deviations of the experimental data from predictions from QCD factorization for $B_{(s)}\rightarrow D_{(s)}P$ decays, where $P={\pi,K}$, we systematically probe the current status of the SU(3)$_F$ expansion from a fit to experimental branching ratio data without any further theory input. We find that the current data are in agreement with the power counting of the SU(3)$_F$ expansion. While the SU(3)$_F$ limit is excluded at $>5\sigma$, amplitude-level SU(3)$_F$-breaking contributions of $\sim 20\%$ suffice for an excellent description of the data. SU(3)$_F$ breaking is needed in tree ($>5\sigma$) and color-suppressed tree ($2.4\sigma$) diagrams. We are not yet sensitive to SU(3)$_F$ breaking in exchange diagrams. From the underlying SU(3)$_F$ parametrization we predict the unmeasured branching ratios $\mathcal{B}(\overline{B}_s0\rightarrow \pi- D+) = 2 \mathcal{B}(\overline{B}_s0\rightarrow \pi0 D0) = [0.3, 7.2] \times 10{-6}$ of suppressed decays that can be searched for at the LHCb experiment.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. M. L. Piscopo and A. V. Rusov, JHEP 10, 180 (2023), arXiv:2307.07594 [hep-ph] .
  2. S. Iguro and T. Kitahara, Phys. Rev. D 102, 071701 (2020), arXiv:2008.01086 [hep-ph] .
  3. R. Fleischer and E. Malami, Phys. Rev. D 106, 056004 (2022), arXiv:2109.04950 [hep-ph] .
  4. J. F. Krohn et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 107, 012003 (2023), arXiv:2207.00134 [hep-ex] .
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 10, 106 (2023), arXiv:2308.00587 [hep-ex] .
  6. E. Waheed et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 105, 012003 (2022), arXiv:2111.04978 [hep-ex] .
  7. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), Phys. Rev. D 104, 032005 (2021a), arXiv:2103.06810 [hep-ex] .
  8. A. Lenz and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, JHEP 07, 177 (2020), arXiv:1912.07621 [hep-ph] .
  9. J. Brod and J. Zupan, JHEP 01, 051 (2014), arXiv:1308.5663 [hep-ph] .
  10. M. Gronau and D. London, Phys. Lett. B 253, 483 (1991).
  11. M. Gronau and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 265, 172 (1991).
  12. A. Bondar, in BINP special analysis meeting on Dalitz analysis, Sep. 24–26 (2002) unpublished.
  13. A. Poluektov et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 70, 072003 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0406067 .
  14. A. Bondar and A. Poluektov, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 347 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0510246 .
  15. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  16. A. Poluektov, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 121 (2018), arXiv:1712.08326 [hep-ph] .
  17. The CKMfitter Group, “Updated Results on the CKM Matrix,”  (2021), http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/www/results/plots_spring21/num/ckmEval_results_spring21.html.
  18. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb),  (2018), arXiv:1808.08865 [hep-ex] .
  19. I. Dunietz, Phys. Lett. B 427, 179 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9712401 .
  20. R. Fleischer, Nucl. Phys. B 671, 459 (2003a), arXiv:hep-ph/0304027 .
  21. R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B 562, 234 (2003b), arXiv:hep-ph/0301255 .
  22. C.-K. Chua and W.-S. Hou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 116001 (2008), arXiv:0712.1882 [hep-ph] .
  23. D. Zeppenfeld, Z. Phys. C 8, 77 (1981).
  24. M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 39, 3346 (1989), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 40, 3127 (1989)].
  25. C.-W. Chiang and E. Senaha, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074021 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0702007 .
  26. M. Jung and T. Mannel, Phys. Rev. D 80, 116002 (2009), arXiv:0907.0117 [hep-ph] .
  27. P. Colangelo and R. Ferrandes, Phys. Lett. B 627, 77 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0508033 .
  28. B. Grinstein and R. F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6344 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9602218 .
  29. M. Neubert and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B 519, 50 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0108103 .
  30. Z.-z. Xing, HEPNP 26, 100 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0107257 .
  31. H.-Y. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 65, 094012 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0108096 .
  32. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D 69, 016006 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0309166 .
  33. C.-W. Chiang and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 67, 074013 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0212274 .
  34. Z.-z. Xing, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 63 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0301024 .
  35. H. Yamamoto,   (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9403255 .
  36. Z.-z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B 364, 55 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9507310 .
  37. Y. S. Amhis et al. (HFLAV), Phys. Rev. D 107, 052008 (2023b), arXiv:2206.07501 [hep-ex] .
  38. K. Abe et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 111801 (2001), arXiv:hep-ex/0104051 .
  39. S. Ahmed et al. (CLEO), Phys. Rev. D 66, 031101 (2002), arXiv:hep-ex/0206030 .
  40. P. Krokovny et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 141802 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0212066 .
  41. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 69, 032004 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0310028 .
  42. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 75, 031101 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0610027 .
  43. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 74, 111102 (2006a), arXiv:hep-ex/0609033 .
  44. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 74, 031101 (2006b), arXiv:hep-ex/0604016 .
  45. Y. Horii et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 78, 071901 (2008), arXiv:0804.2063 [hep-ex] .
  46. J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar), Phys. Rev. D 84, 112007 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 87, 039901 (2013)], arXiv:1107.5751 [hep-ex] .
  47. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 04, 001 (2013), arXiv:1301.5286 [hep-ex] .
  48. Y. Kato et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 97, 012005 (2018), arXiv:1709.06108 [hep-ex] .
  49. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb), JHEP 04, 081 (2021b), arXiv:2012.09903 [hep-ex] .
  50. T. Bloomfield et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 105, 072007 (2022), arXiv:2111.12337 [hep-ex] .
  51. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 869 (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat] .

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.