Quantum Dynamical Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Abstract: One of the open challenges in quantum computing is to find meaningful and practical methods to leverage quantum computation to accelerate classical machine learning workflows. A ubiquitous problem in machine learning workflows is sampling from probability distributions that we only have access to via their log probability. To this end, we extend the well-known Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) method for Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to leverage quantum computation in a hybrid manner as a proposal function. Our new algorithm, Quantum Dynamical Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (QD-HMC), replaces the classical symplectic integration proposal step with simulations of quantum-coherent continuous-space dynamics on digital or analogue quantum computers. We show that QD-HMC maintains key characteristics of HMC, such as maintaining the detailed balanced condition with momentum inversion, while also having the potential for polynomial speedups over its classical counterpart in certain scenarios. As sampling is a core subroutine in many forms of probabilistic inference, and MCMC in continuously-parameterized spaces covers a large-class of potential applications, this work widens the areas of applicability of quantum devices.
- Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep learning, nature 521, 436 (2015).
- J. Chow, O. Dial, and J. Gambetta, Ibm quantum breaks the 100-qubit processor barrier, IBM Research Blog (2021).
- J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
- U. Von Toussaint, Bayesian inference in physics, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 943 (2011).
- D. Bertsimas and J. Tsitsiklis, Simulated annealing, Statistical science 8, 10 (1993).
- Y. Du and I. Mordatch, Implicit generation and generalization in energy-based models, arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.08689 (2019).
- O. Lockwood and M. Si, Reinforcement learning with quantum variational circuit, in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, Vol. 16 (2020) pp. 245–251.
- O. Lockwood and M. Si, Playing atari with hybrid quantum-classical reinforcement learning, in NeurIPS 2020 Workshop on Pre-registration in Machine Learning (PMLR, 2021) pp. 285–301.
- M. Betancourt, A conceptual introduction to hamiltonian monte carlo, arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02434 (2017).
- C. Robert and G. Casella, A short history of markov chain monte carlo: Subjective recollections from incomplete data, Statistical Science 26, 102 (2011).
- A. Orfi, Near-Term Quantum Algorithms for Classical Sampling, Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo (2023).
- E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm, arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.4028 (2014).
- W. K. Hastings, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970), https://academic.oup.com/biomet/article-pdf/57/1/97/23940249/57-1-97.pdf .
- G. O. Roberts and R. L. Tweedie, Exponential convergence of langevin distributions and their discrete approximations, Bernoulli , 341 (1996).
- X. Cheng and P. Bartlett, Convergence of langevin mcmc in kl-divergence, in Algorithmic Learning Theory (PMLR, 2018) pp. 186–211.
- N. Bou-Rabee and J. M. Sanz-Serna, Geometric integrators and the hamiltonian monte carlo method, Acta Numerica 27, 113 (2018).
- R. M. Neal et al., Mcmc using hamiltonian dynamics, Handbook of markov chain monte carlo 2, 2 (2011).
- R. D. Somma, Quantum simulations of one dimensional quantum systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.06319 (2015).
- G. Verdon, J. Pye, and M. Broughton, A universal training algorithm for quantum deep learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.09729 (2018).
- D. Coppersmith, An approximate fourier transform useful in quantum factoring, arXiv preprint quant-ph/0201067 (2002).
- X.-S. Yang, Test problems in optimization, arXiv preprint arXiv:1008.0549 (2010).
- V. Beiranvand, W. Hare, and Y. Lucet, Best practices for comparing optimization algorithms, Optimization and Engineering 18, 815 (2017).
- J. J. Moré and S. M. Wild, Benchmarking derivative-free optimization algorithms, SIAM Journal on Optimization 20, 172 (2009).
- github.com/QuantumVerd/cv-tfq.
- github.com/diracq/qdhmc.
- T. Chen, E. Fox, and C. Guestrin, Stochastic gradient hamiltonian monte carlo, in International conference on machine learning (PMLR, 2014) pp. 1683–1691.
- L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, in Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (1996) pp. 212–219.
- A. Bapat and S. Jordan, Bang-bang control as a design principle for classical and quantum optimization algorithms, Quantum Info. Comput. 19, 424–446 (2019).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.