Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 90 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 456 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

LLMs in Political Science: Heralding a New Era of Visual Analysis (2403.00154v2)

Published 29 Feb 2024 in cs.CV and cs.AI

Abstract: Interest is increasing among political scientists in leveraging the extensive information available in images. However, the challenge of interpreting these images lies in the need for specialized knowledge in computer vision and access to specialized hardware. As a result, image analysis has been limited to a relatively small group within the political science community. This landscape could potentially change thanks to the rise of LLMs. This paper aims to raise awareness of the feasibility of using Gemini for image content analysis. A retrospective analysis was conducted on a corpus of 688 images. Content reports were elicited from Gemini for each image and then manually evaluated by the authors. We find that Gemini is highly accurate in performing object detection, which is arguably the most common and fundamental task in image analysis for political scientists. Equally important, we show that it is easy to implement as the entire command consists of a single prompt in natural language; it is fast to run and should meet the time budget of most researchers; and it is free to use and does not require any specialized hardware. In addition, we illustrate how political scientists can leverage Gemini for other image understanding tasks, including face identification, sentiment analysis, and caption generation. Our findings suggest that Gemini and other similar LLMs have the potential to drastically stimulate and accelerate image research in political science and social sciences more broadly.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. Wang, Y.: On finetuning large language models. Political Analysis (2023) Osnabrügge et al. [2021] Osnabrügge, M., Ash, E., Morelli, M.: Cross-Domain Topic Classification for Political Texts. Political Analysis (2021) Torres and Cantú [2022] Torres, M., Cantú, F.: Learning to see: Convolutional neural networks for the analysis of social science data. Political Analysis (2022) Torres [2023] Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Osnabrügge, M., Ash, E., Morelli, M.: Cross-Domain Topic Classification for Political Texts. Political Analysis (2021) Torres and Cantú [2022] Torres, M., Cantú, F.: Learning to see: Convolutional neural networks for the analysis of social science data. Political Analysis (2022) Torres [2023] Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Torres, M., Cantú, F.: Learning to see: Convolutional neural networks for the analysis of social science data. Political Analysis (2022) Torres [2023] Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  2. Osnabrügge, M., Ash, E., Morelli, M.: Cross-Domain Topic Classification for Political Texts. Political Analysis (2021) Torres and Cantú [2022] Torres, M., Cantú, F.: Learning to see: Convolutional neural networks for the analysis of social science data. Political Analysis (2022) Torres [2023] Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Torres, M., Cantú, F.: Learning to see: Convolutional neural networks for the analysis of social science data. Political Analysis (2022) Torres [2023] Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  3. Torres, M., Cantú, F.: Learning to see: Convolutional neural networks for the analysis of social science data. Political Analysis (2022) Torres [2023] Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  4. Torres, M.: A framework for the unsupervised and semi-supervised analysis of visual frames. Political Analysis (2023) Girbau et al. [2023] Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  5. Girbau, A., Kobayashi, T., Renoust, B., Matsui, Y., Satoh, S.: Face detection, tracking, and classification from large-scale news archives for analysis of key political figures. Political Analysis (2023) Bay and an Luc Van Gool [2006] Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  6. Bay, H., Luc Van Gool, T.T.: Surf: Speeded up robust features. 9th European Conference on Computer Vision (2006) Arandjelović and Zisserman [2012] Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  7. Arandjelović, R., Zisserman, A.: Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval. 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2012) Girshick et al. [2014] Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  8. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. 2014 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2014) Gilardi et al. [2023] Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  9. Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., Kubli, M.: Chatgpt outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023) Huang et al. [2023] Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  10. Huang, F., Kwak, H., An, J.: Is chatgpt better than human annotators? potential and limitations of chatgpt in explaining implicit hate speech. WWW ’23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (2023) Roberts et al. [2014] Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  11. Roberts, M.E., Stewart, B.M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S.K., Albertson, B., Rand, D.G.: Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science (2014) Truhn et al. [2023] Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023) Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)
  12. Truhn, D., Weber, C.D., Braun, B.J., Bressem, K., Kather, J.N., Kuhl, C., Nebelung, S.: A pilot study on the efficacy of gpt-4 in providing orthopedic treatment recommendations from mri reports. Scientific Reports 13 (2023)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 8 likes.