Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 180 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 32 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Two shell- and wing-shaped supernova remnants. Investigating the molecular environments around VRO 42.05.01 and G 350.0-2.0 (2402.10763v1)

Published 16 Feb 2024 in astro-ph.HE and astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Supernova remnants (SNRs) are profoundly affected by their ambient medium. We present carbon monoxide (CO) observations around two mixed morphology SNRs, VRO 42.05.01 and G 350.0-2.0, that look remarkably similar in continuum radio emission, showing what we refer to as a shell and wing shape. It has been proposed that the shell and wing shape is the result of environmental effects, in the form of a sharp density gradient or discontinuity. Our motivation for studying these two sources jointly is that if the dense molecular environment causes the development of these sources' shell and wing shape, then these two sources' environments must be similar. This is contrary to what we observe. In the case of VRO 42.05.01, we have found direct evidence of an interaction with its molecular environment, in the form of broadened ${12}$CO line profiles, high $(J=2-1)$ to $(J=1-0)$ line ratios, and arc features in position-velocity space. We interpret some of these features to be associated with the SNR shock, and some of them to be due to the presence of a pre-supernova stellar wind. We have found no such features in the abundant molecular gas surrounding G 350.0-2.0. We have also made a spectral index map of G 350.0-2.0, and we see that the radio spectrum of G 350.0-2.0 steepens significantly at frequencies $<200$~MHz, much like that of VRO 42.05.01. In spite of their spectral and morphological similarities, these two sources look substantially different in their optical and infrared emission. The lack of large-scale correspondence between the radio continuum and the molecular material, as well as the differences in the excitation and morphological properties of the molecular gas surrounding both sources, lead us to conclude that the shell and wing morphology of these two sources is not due to interactions with a similar ambient molecular ISM.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.