Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A model-based framework for controlling activated sludge plants (2401.10619v1)

Published 19 Jan 2024 in eess.SY, cs.SY, and math.OC

Abstract: This work presents a general framework for the advanced control of a common class of activated sludge plants (ASPs). Based on a dynamic model of the process and plant sensors and actuators, we design and configure a highly customisable Output Model-Predictive Controller (Output MPC) for the flexible operation of ASPs as water resource recovery facilities. The controller consists of a i) Moving-Horizon Estimator for determining the state of the process, from plant measurements, and ii) a Model-Predictive Controller for determining the optimal actions to attain high-level operational goals. The Output MPC can be configured to satisfy the technological limits of the plant equipment, as well as operational desiderata defined by plant personnel. We consider exemplary problems and show that the framework is able to control ASPs for tasks of practical relevance, ranging from wastewater treatment subject to normative limits, to the production of an effluent with varying nitrogen content, and energy recovery.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Sandra Ricart and Antonio M. Rico “Assessing technical and social driving factors of water reuse in agriculture: A review on risks, regulation and the yuck factor” In Agric. Water Manag. 217, 2019, pp. 426–439 DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.017
  2. “Source and central level recovery of nutrients from urine and wastewater: A state-of-art on nutrients mapping and potential technological solutions” In J. of Environ. Chem. Eng. 10.2, 2022, pp. 107146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107146
  3. Gideon Sarpong and Veera Gnaneswar Gude “Near future energy self-sufficient wastewater treatment schemes” In Int. J. of Environ. Res. 14 Springer, 2020, pp. 479–488 DOI: 10.1007/s41742-020-00262-5
  4. World Health Organization “Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta, and greywater”, 2006
  5. “EBP2R - An innovative enhanced biological nutrient recovery activated sludge system to produce growth medium for green microalgae cultivation” In Water Res. 68, 2015, pp. 821–830 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.027
  6. “Energy and nutrient recovery for municipal wastewater treatment: How to design a feasible plant layout?” In Environ. Model. & Softw. 68, 2015, pp. 156–165 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.02.011
  7. “Control structure design for resource recovery using the enhanced biological phosphorus removal and recovery (EBP2R) activated sludge process” In Chem. Eng. J. 296, 2016, pp. 447–457 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.021
  8. “COD capture: a feasible option towards energy self-sufficient domestic wastewater treatment” In Sci. Reps. 6.1, 2016, pp. 1–9 DOI: 10.1038/srep25054
  9. “Quantitative assessment of energy and resource recovery in wastewater treatment plants based on plant-wide simulations” In Water Res. 118, 2017, pp. 272–288 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.04.001
  10. “Economic evaluation of ion-exchange processes for nutrient removal and recovery from municipal wastewater” In npj Clean Water 3, 2020, pp. 7 DOI: 10.1038/s41545-020-0054-x
  11. Zivko Juznic-Zonta, Albert Guisasola and Juan Antonio Baeza “Smart-Plant Decision Support System (SP-DSS): Defining a multi-criteria decision-making framework for the selection of WWTP configurations with resource recovery” In J. of Clean. Prod. 367, 2022, pp. 132873 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132873
  12. B.M.Gawlik L.Alcalde-Sanz “Minimum quality requirements for water reuse in agricultural irrigation and aquifer recharge - Towards a water reuse regulatory instrument at EU level”, 2017 DOI: 10.2760/887727
  13. Council of the European Union “Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council, no. 2022/0345/COD” (accessed 14/12/2023), 2022 URL: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/Proposal%5C%20for%5C%20a%5C%20Directive%5C%20concerning%5C%20urban%5C%20wastewater%5C%20treatment%5C%20%5C%28recast%5C%29.pdf
  14. “Model Predictive Control in Industry: Challenges and Opportunities” In IFAC-PapersOnLine 48.8, 2015, pp. 531–538 DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.022
  15. James B. Rawlings, David Q. Mayne and Moritz M. Diehl “Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation and Design” Nob Hill Publ., LLC., 2020
  16. “Smart Water Utilities: Complexity Made Simple” IWA Publ., 2016 DOI: 10.2166/9781780407586
  17. Various Authors “WWTModels” (accessed 21/09/2023), 2020 URL: https://github.com/wwtmodels
  18. “A Framework for extreme-event control in wastewater treatment” In Water Sci. & Technol. 45.4–5, 2002, pp. 299–308 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2002.0610
  19. J. Alex, R. Tschepetzki and U. Jumar “Predictive control of nitrogen removal in WWTP using parsimonious models” In Proc. of the 15th IFAC World Congr. on Autom. Control, 2002, pp. 1458–1458 DOI: 10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01460
  20. “Model predictive control of wastewater treatment plants: Application to the BSM1 benchmark” In Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 18 Elsevier, 2004, pp. 625–630 DOI: 10.1016/S1570-7946(04)80170-6
  21. “Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: A simulation study” In Water Res. 41.9, 2007, pp. 2004–2014 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.029
  22. W. Shen, X. Chen and J.P. Corriou “Application of model predictive control to the BSM1 benchmark of wastewater treatment process” In Comput. & Chem. Eng. 22.12, 2008, pp. 2849–2856 DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.01.009
  23. “Model predictive control for wastewater treatment process with feedforward compensation” In Chem. Eng. J. 155.1, 2009, pp. 161–174 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.07.039
  24. “Predictive control of an activated sludge process for long term operation” In Chem. Eng. J. 304, 2016, pp. 1031–1044 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.018
  25. “Model-based predictive control of a pre-denitrification plant: linear state-space model approach” In Proc. of the 15th IFAC World Congr. on Autom. Control, 2002, pp. 1462–1462 DOI: 10.3182/20020721-6-ES-1901.01464
  26. M. Ekman “Bilinear black-box identification and MPC of the activated sludge process” In J. of Process Control 18.7–8, 2008, pp. 643–653 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.12.006
  27. G.S. Ostace, V.M. Cristea and P.S. Agachi “Cost reduction of the wastewater treatment plant operation by MPC based on modified ASM1 with two-step nitrification/denitrification model” In Comput. & Chem. Eng. 35.11, 2011, pp. 2469–2479 DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.031
  28. “Predictive control of an activated sludge process: An application to the Viikinmäki wastewater treatment plant” In J. of Process Control 35, 2015, pp. 89–100 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.08.005
  29. M. Francisco, S. Skogestad and P. Vega “Model predictive control for the self-optimized operation in wastewater treatment plants: Analysis of dynamic issues” In Comput. & Chem. Eng. 82, 2015, pp. 259–272 DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.07.003
  30. “Economic Model Predictive Control of Wastewater Treatment Processes” In Ind. & Eng. Chem. Res. 54.21, 2015, pp. 5710–5721 DOI: 10.1021/ie504995n
  31. “Economic MPC of Wastewater Treatment Plants Based on Model Reduction” In Processes 7, 2019, pp. 682 DOI: 10.3390/pr7100682
  32. “Distributed economic model predictive control of wastewater treatment plants” In Chem. Eng. Res. and Des. 141, 2019, pp. 144–155 DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.10.039
  33. R. Moliner-Heredia, I. Penarrocha-Alos and R. Sanchis-Llopis “Economic model predictive control of wastewater treatment plants based on BSM1 using linear prediction models” In IEEE 15th Int. Conf. on Control and Autom. (ICCA), 2019, pp. 73–78 DOI: 10.1109/ICCA.2019.8899974
  34. Ioannis Kalogeropoulos, Alex Alexandridis and Haralambos Sarimveis “Economic oriented dynamic matrix control of wastewater treatment plants” In J. of Process Control 118, 2022, pp. 202–217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.08.006
  35. “State estimation of wastewater treatment plants based on model approximation” In Comput. & Chem. Eng. 111, 2018, pp. 79–91 DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.01.003
  36. Xunyuan Yin, Benjamin Decardi-Nelson and Jinfeng Liu “Subsystem decomposition and distributed moving horizon estimation of wastewater treatment plants” In Chem. Eng. Res. and Des. 134, 2018, pp. 405–419 DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.04.032
  37. “Subsystem decomposition of process networks for simultaneous distributed state estimation and control” In AIChE J. 65.3, 2019, pp. 904–914 DOI: 10.1002/aic.16426
  38. “Activated Sludge - 100 Years and Counting” IWA Publ., 2014
  39. “Instrumentation, control and automation in wastewater - from London 1973 to Narbonne 2013” In Water Sci. & Technol. 69.7, 2014, pp. 1372–1385 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2014.057
  40. “Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants”, Scientific and Technical Report Series No. 23 IWA Publ., 2014 DOI: 978-1-84-339146-3
  41. “Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3”, Scientific and Technical Report Series No. 9 IWA Publ., 2000
  42. I. Takács, G.G. Patry and D. Nolasco “A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process” In Water Res. 25.10, 1991, pp. 1263–1271 DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90066-Y
  43. “Evaluation of an ASM1 model calibration procedure on a municipal-industrial wastewater treatment plant” In J. of Hydroinform. 4.1, 2002, pp. 15–38 DOI: 10.2166/hydro.2002.0003
  44. “Calibration of Activated Sludge Models: A Critical Review of Experimental Designs” In Biotechnology for the Environment: Wastewater Treatment and Modeling, Waste Gas Handling Springer, 2003, pp. 101–186 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0932-3_5
  45. Jes la Cour Jansen Jukka Keskitalo and Kauko Leiviskä “Calibration and validation of a modified ASM1 using long-term simulation of a full-scale pulp mill wastewater treatment plant” In Environ. Technol. 31.5 Taylor & Francis, 2010, pp. 555–566 DOI: 10.1080/09593330903563802
  46. “Towards more predictive clarification models via experimental determination of flocculent settling coefficient value” In Water Res. 190, 2021, pp. 116294 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116294
  47. “Dynamic calibration of a new secondary settler model using Cand. Microthrix as a predictor of settling velocity” In Water Res. 246, 2023, pp. 120664 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120664
  48. Otacílio B.L. Neto, Michela Mulas and Francesco Corona “About the classical and structural controllability and observability of a common class of activated sludge plants” In J. of Process Control 111, 2022, pp. 8–26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2021.12.013
  49. “Development of a simulation protocol for evaluation of respirometry-based control strategies” In Combined Technical Report of the BIOMATH Department, Ghent University, Belgium and the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Canada., 1996
  50. John T Betts “Practical methods for optimal control and estimation using nonlinear programming”, Advances in Design and Control SIAM, 2010
  51. Stephen P. Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe “Convex optimization” Cambridge University Press, 2004
  52. “Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality” In Automatica 36.6, 2000, pp. 789–814 DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9
  53. Christopher V. Rao and James B. Rawlings “Constrained process monitoring: Moving-horizon approach” In AIChE J. 48.1, 2002, pp. 97–109 DOI: 10.1002/aic.690480111
  54. G. Patry, and D. Nolasco, “A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process,” Water Res., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1263–1271, 1991. DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(91)90066-Y.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now