Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 131 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 185 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 425 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Learning based numerical methods for Helmholtz equation with high frequency (2401.09118v1)

Published 17 Jan 2024 in math.NA and cs.NA

Abstract: High-frequency issues have been remarkably challenges in numerical methods for partial differential equations. In this paper, a learning based numerical method (LbNM) is proposed for Helmholtz equation with high frequency. The main novelty is using Tikhonov regularization method to stably learn the solution operator by utilizing relevant information especially the fundamental solutions. Then applying the solution operator to a new boundary input could quickly update the solution. Based on the method of fundamental solutions and the quantitative Runge approximation, we give the error estimate. This indicates interpretability and generalizability of the present method. Numerical results validates the error analysis and demonstrates the high-precision and high-efficiency features.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. T. Hrycak and V. Isakov. Increased stability in the continuation of solutions to the Helmholtz equation. Inverse Problems, 20:697, 03 2004.
  2. Increasing stability in an inverse problem for the acoustic equation. Inverse Problems, 29(2):025012, 2013.
  3. Increasing stability in the inverse source problem with many frequencies. Journal of Differential Equations, 260(5):4786–4804, 2016.
  4. M. Entekhabi and V. Isakov. Increasing stability in acoustic and elastic inverse source problems. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 52(5):5232–5256, 2020.
  5. R. Mathon and R. L. Johnston. The approximate solution of elliptic boundary-value problems by fundamental solutions. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 14(4):638–650, 1977.
  6. An overview of the method of fundamental solutions-solvability, uniqueness, convergence, and stability. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 120:118–152, 2020.
  7. P. Antunes. A numerical algorithm to reduce the ill conditioning in meshless methods for the Helmholtz equation. Numerical Algorithms, 79, 11 2018.
  8. P. Antunes. Reducing the ill conditioning in the method of fundamental solutions. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 44, 02 2018.
  9. P. Antunes. A well-conditioned method of fundamental solutions for Laplace equation. Numerical Algorithms, 91, 04 2022.
  10. A.H. Barnett and T. Betcke. Stability and convergence of the method of fundamental solutions for Helmholtz problems on analytic domains. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(14):7003–7026, 2008.
  11. P. D. Lax. A stability theorem for solutions of abstract differential equations, and its application to the study of the local behavior of solutions of elliptic equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 9(4):747–766, 1956.
  12. B. Malgrange. Existence et approximation des solutions des équations aux dérivées partielles et des équations de convolution. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 6:271–355, 1956.
  13. A. Rüland and M. Salo. Quantitative runge approximation and inverse problems. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2019(20):6216–6234, 2018.
  14. Runge approximation and stability improvement for a partial data Calderón problem for the acoustic Helmholtz equation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 16:251–281, 01 2021.
  15. Valter Pohjola. On quantitative runge approximation for the time harmonic maxwell equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 375(08):5727–5751, 2022.
  16. V. Kravchenko and V. Vicente-Benítez. Runge property and approximation by complete systems of solutions for strongly elliptic equations. Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, 67(3):661–682, 2022.
  17. The numerical realization of the probe method for the inverse scattering problems from the near-field data. Inverse Problems, 21(3):839–855, 2005.
  18. A. N. Tikhonov and V. Arsenin. Solutions of ill-posed problems. Wiley, New York, 1977.
  19. Inverse boundary value problem for the Helmholtz equation: quantitative conditional Lipschitz stability estimates. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 48(6):3962–3983, 2016.
  20. L. C. Evans. Partial differential equations, Second edition. American Math. Society, 2016.
  21. Bounding eigenvalues of elliptic operators. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 9(4):768–773, 1978.
  22. Harmonic measures and numerical computation of Cauchy problems for Laplace equations. Chinese Annals of Mathematics, Series B, 44(6):913–928, 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 1 like.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: