Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 78 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 169 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 469 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Comparative analysis of the SFR of AGN and non-AGN galaxies, as a function of stellar mass, AGN power, cosmic time and obscuration (2401.08760v1)

Published 16 Jan 2024 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: This study involves a comparative analysis of the SFRs of AGN and non-AGN galaxies and of the SFRs of type 1 and 2 AGN. To carry out this investigation, we assembled a dataset consisting of 2\,677 X-ray AGN detected by the XMM-Newton observatory and a control sample of 64\,556 galaxies devoid of AGN. We generated SEDs for these objects using photometric data from the DES, VHS, and AllWISE surveys, and we harnessed the CIGALE code to extract measurements for the (host) galaxy properties. Our dataset encompasses sources spanning a range from $\rm 9.5<\log\,[M_(M_\odot)]<12.0$, $\rm 42<\log\,[L_{X,2-10keV}(ergs{-1})]<45.5$, and $\rm 0.3<z<2.5$. To compare SFRs, we calculated the SFR${norm}$ parameter. Our analysis revealed that AGN tend to exhibit elevated SFRs compared to non-AGN galaxies, particularly beyond a certain threshold in L$_X$. Notably, this threshold increases as we move towards more massive galaxies. Additionally, for AGN systems with the same L$_X$, the magnitude of the SFR${norm}$ decreases as we consider more massive galaxies. This suggests that in galaxies with AGN, the increase in SFR as a function of M$_$ is not as prominent as in galaxies without AGN. This interpretation finds support in the shallower slope we identify in the X-ray star-forming MS in contrast to the galaxy MS. Employing CIGALE's measurements, we classified AGN into type 1 and type 2. In our investigation, we focused on a subset of 652 type 1 AGN and 293 type 2 AGN with $\rm 10.5<\log,[M_(M_\odot)]<11.5$. Based on our results, type 1 AGN display higher SFRs than type 2 AGN, at redshifts below $\rm z<1$. However, at higher redshifts, the SFRs of the two AGN populations tend to be similar. At redshifts $\rm z<1$, type 1 AGN show augmented SFRs in comparison to non-AGN galaxies. In contrast, type 2 AGN exhibit lower SFRs when compared to galaxies that do not host an AGN.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube