Snake Robot with Tactile Perception Navigates on Large-scale Challenging Terrain
Abstract: Along with the advancement of robot skin technology, there has been notable progress in the development of snake robots featuring body-surface tactile perception. In this study, we proposed a locomotion control framework for snake robots that integrates tactile perception to augment their adaptability to various terrains. Our approach embraces a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) architecture, wherein the high-level orchestrates global navigation strategies while the low-level uses curriculum learning for local navigation maneuvers. Due to the significant computational demands of collision detection in whole-body tactile sensing, the efficiency of the simulator is severely compromised. Thus a distributed training pattern to mitigate the efficiency reduction was adopted. We evaluated the navigation performance of the snake robot in complex large-scale cave exploration with challenging terrains to exhibit improvements in motion efficiency, evidencing the efficacy of tactile perception in terrain-adaptive locomotion of snake robots.
- E. Kelasidi, P. Liljeback, K. Y. Pettersen, and J. T. Gravdahl, “Innovation in underwater robots: Biologically inspired swimming snake robots,” IEEE robotics & automation magazine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 44–62, 2016.
- J. Whitman, N. Zevallos, M. Travers, and H. Choset, “Snake robot urban search after the 2017 mexico city earthquake,” in 2018 IEEE international symposium on safety, security, and rescue robotics (SSRR). IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–6.
- E. Sihite, P. Ghanem, A. Salagame, and A. Ramezani, “Unsteady aerodynamic modeling of Aerobat using lifting line theory and Wagner’s function,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Oct. 2022, pp. 10 493–10 500, iSSN: 2153-0866.
- E. Sihite, P. Dangol, and A. Ramezani, “Unilateral Ground Contact Force Regulations in Thruster-Assisted Legged Locomotion,” in 2021 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), July 2021, pp. 389–395, iSSN: 2159-6255.
- A. Ramezani, P. Dangol, E. Sihite, A. Lessieur, and P. Kelly, “Generative Design of NU’s Husky Carbon, A Morpho-Functional, Legged Robot,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2021, pp. 4040–4046, iSSN: 2577-087X.
- A. Lessieur, E. Sihite, P. Dangol, A. Singhal, and A. Ramezani, “Mechanical design and fabrication of a kinetic sculpture with application to bioinspired drone design,” in Unmanned Systems Technology XXIII, vol. 11758. SPIE, Apr. 2021, pp. 21–27. [Online]. Available: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11758/1175806/Mechanical-design-and-fabrication-of-a-kinetic-sculpture-with-application/10.1117/12.2587898.full
- A. C. B. de Oliveira and A. Ramezani, “Thruster-assisted Center Manifold Shaping in Bipedal Legged Locomotion,” in 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), July 2020, pp. 508–513, iSSN: 2159-6255.
- J. W. Grizzle, A. Ramezani, B. Buss, B. Griï¬fn, K. A. Hamed, and K. S. Galloway, “Progress on Controlling MARLO, an ATRIAS-series 3D Underactuated Bipedal Robot.”
- E. Sihite, A. Kalantari, R. Nemovi, A. Ramezani, and M. Gharib, “Multi-Modal Mobility Morphobot (M4) with appendage repurposing for locomotion plasticity enhancement,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 3323, June 2023, number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39018-y
- E. Sihite, A. Lessieur, P. Dangol, A. Singhal, and A. Ramezani, “Orientation stabilization in a bioinspired bat-robot using integrated mechanical intelligence and control,” in Unmanned Systems Technology XXIII, vol. 11758. SPIE, Apr. 2021, pp. 12–20. [Online]. Available: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie/11758/1175805/Orientation-stabilization-in-a-bioinspired-bat-robot-using-integrated-mechanical/10.1117/12.2587894.full
- A. Ramezani, “Towards biomimicry of a bat-style perching maneuver on structures: the manipulation of inertial dynamics,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2020, pp. 7015–7021, iSSN: 2577-087X.
- E. Rezapour, K. Y. Pettersen, P. Liljebäck, J. T. Gravdahl, and E. Kelasidi, “Path following control of planar snake robots using virtual holonomic constraints: theory and experiments,” Robotics and biomimetics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014.
- B. A. Elsayed, T. Takemori, M. Tanaka, and F. Matsuno, “Mobile manipulation using a snake robot in a helical gait,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2600–2611, 2021.
- Z. Bing, L. Cheng, K. Huang, M. Zhou, and A. Knoll, “Cpg-based control of smooth transition for body shape and locomotion speed of a snake-like robot,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 4146–4153.
- F. Sanfilippo, Ø. Stavdahl, G. Marafioti, A. A. Transeth, and P. Liljebäck, “Virtual functional segmentation of snake robots for perception-driven obstacle-aided locomotion?” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE, 2016, pp. 1845–1851.
- T. Takemori, M. Tanaka, and F. Matsuno, “Hoop-passing motion for a snake robot to realize motion transition across different environments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1696–1711, 2021.
- Z. Bing, C. Lemke, F. O. Morin, Z. Jiang, L. Cheng, K. Huang, and A. Knoll, “Perception-action coupling target tracking control for a snake robot via reinforcement learning,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 14, p. 591128, 2020.
- P. Liljeback, K. Y. Pettersen, Ø. Stavdahl, and J. T. Gravdahl, “Snake robot locomotion in environments with obstacles,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1158–1169, 2011.
- T. Kamegawa, T. Akiyama, Y. Suzuki, T. Kishutani, and A. Gofuku, “Three-dimensional reflexive behavior by a snake robot with full circumference pressure sensors,” in 2020 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). IEEE, 2020, pp. 897–902.
- D. Ramesh, Q. Fu, and C. S. Li, “A snake robot with contact force sensing for studying locomotion in complex 3-d terrain,” in Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2022, pp. 23–27.
- T. Kamegawa, R. Kuroki, M. Travers, and H. Choset, “Proposal of earli for the snake robot’s obstacle aided locomotion,” in 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR). IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–6.
- W. Zhen, C. Gong, and H. Choset, “Modeling rolling gaits of a snake robot,” in 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2015, pp. 3741–3746.
- G. Bellegarda and A. Ijspeert, “Cpg-rl: Learning central pattern generators for quadruped locomotion,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 12 547–12 554, 2022.
- N. D. Kent, D. Neiman, M. Travers, and T. M. Howard, “Improved performance of cpg parameter inference for path-following control of legged robots,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 11 963–11 970.
- G. Bellegarda and A. Ijspeert, “Visual cpg-rl: Learning central pattern generators for visually-guided quadruped navigation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14400, 2022.
- X. Liu, C. Onal, and J. Fu, “Learning contact-aware cpg-based locomotion in a soft snake robot,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04608, 2021.
- “https://www.nasa.gov/feature/northeastern-university-slithers-to-the-top-with-big-idea-alternative-rover-concept.”
- A. A. Transeth, R. I. Leine, C. Glocker, and K. Y. Pettersen, “3-d snake robot motion: nonsmooth modeling, simulations, and experiments,” IEEE transactions on robotics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 361–376, 2008.
- P. Liljeback, K. Y. Pettersen, Ø. Stavdahl, and J. T. Gravdahl, “Experimental investigation of obstacle-aided locomotion with a snake robot,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 792–800, 2011.
- S. Hasanzadeh and A. A. Tootoonchi, “Ground adaptive and optimized locomotion of snake robot moving with a novel gait,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 28, pp. 457–470, 2010.
- T. Haarnoja, A. Zhou, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 1861–1870.
- X. Lyu, Y. Xiao, B. Daley, and C. Amato, “Contrasting centralized and decentralized critics in multi-agent reinforcement learning,” 2021.
- S. Jiang and C. Amato, “Multi-agent reinforcement learning with directed exploration and selective memory reuse,” in Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM symposium on applied computing, 2021, pp. 777–784.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.