Neuromimetic Dynamic Networks with Hebbian Learning (2310.02350v1)
Abstract: Leveraging recent advances in neuroscience and control theory, this paper presents a neuromimetic network model with dynamic symmetric connections governed by Hebbian learning rules. Formal analysis grounded in graph theory and classical control establishes that this biologically plausible model exhibits boundedness, stability, and structural controllability given a generalized sym-cactus structure with multiple control nodes. We prove the necessity of this topology when there are distributed control inputs. Simulations using a 14-node generalized sym-cactus network with two input types validate the model's effectiveness in capturing key neural dynamics.
- WS McCulloch, W. Pitts, “A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity”, The bulletin of mathematical biophysics 1943 Dec;5:115-33.
- AL. Hodgkin and AF. Huxley, “Currents carried by sodium and potassiumions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo”, The Journal of physiology, 1952 Apr 4;116(4):449.
- JJ. Hopfield, “Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities”, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, (PNAS), 1982 Apr;79(8):2554-8.
- Z. Sun and J. Baillieul. Neuromimetic Linear Systems—Resilience and Learning. In 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (pp. 7388-7394). IEEE, 2022.
- H. Mayeda, “On structural controllability theorem,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 795–798, Jun. 1981.
- R. F. Galan, “On how network architecture determines the dominant patterns of spontaneous neural activity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 5, 2008, Art. no. e2148.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.