Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

GAIDE: A Framework for Using Generative AI to Assist in Course Content Development (2308.12276v4)

Published 23 Aug 2023 in cs.CY

Abstract: This paper introduces "GAIDE: Generative AI for Instructional Development and Education," a novel framework for using Generative AI (GenAI) to enhance educational content creation. GAIDE stands out by offering a practical approach for educators to produce diverse, engaging, and academically rigorous materials. It integrates GenAI into curriculum design, easing the workload of instructors and elevating material quality. With GAIDE, we present a distinct, adaptable model that harnesses technological progress in education, marking a step towards more efficient instructional development. Motivated by the demand for innovative educational content and the rise of GenAI use among students, this research tackles the challenge of adapting and integrating technology into teaching. GAIDE aims to streamline content development, encourage the creation of dynamic materials, and demonstrate GenAI's utility in instructional design. The framework is grounded in constructivist learning theory and TPCK, emphasizing the importance of integrating technology in a manner that complements pedagogical goals and content knowledge. Our approach aids educators in crafting effective GenAI prompts and guides them through interactions with GenAI tools, both of which are critical for generating high-quality, contextually appropriate content. Initial evaluations indicate GAIDE reduces time and effort in content creation, without compromising on the breadth or depth of the content. Moreover, the use of GenAI has shown promise in deterring conventional cheating methods, suggesting a positive impact on academic integrity and student engagement.

PDF HTML Abstract
Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Devin Bates. 2023. ChatGPT in the Workplace - A Legal Minefield! What You Need to Know to Protect Your Business. JDSupra (May 2023). https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/chatgpt-in-the-workplace-a-legal-3653749/
  2. Programming Is Hard - Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities and Challenges of AI Code Generation. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 500–506. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569759
  3. Christopher Bull and Ahmed Kharrufa. 2023. Generative AI Assistants in Software Development Education: A vision for integrating Generative AI into educational practice, not instinctively defending against it. IEEE Software (2023), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2023.3300574
  4. Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts. ACS Nano 17, 5 (2023), 4091–4093. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544 PMID: 36848601.
  5. The economic potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier#introduction
  6. Jack Conklin. 2005. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives complete edition.
  7. Doraid Dalalah and Osama M.A. Dalalah. 2023. The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT. The International Journal of Management Education 21, 2 (2023), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822
  8. Adam DeRose. 2023. These companies have banned or limited ChatGPT at work. HR Brew (May 2023). https://www.hr-brew.com/stories/2023/05/11/these-companies-have-banned-chatgpt-in-the-office
  9. Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption. arXiv:2308.12258 [cs.CY]
  10. Richard M Felder and Rebecca Brent. 2016. Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons.
  11. The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming. In Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (ACE ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511863
  12. Karla Grossenbacher. 2023. ChatGPT in the Workplace: To Restrict or Embrace, That Is The Question. Labor and Employment Law Newsletter - Spring 2023 51, 1 (Jun 2023). https://www.americanbar.org/groups/labor_law/publications/labor_employment_law_news/spring-2023/chatgpt-in-the-workplace/
  13. Stephen Anthony Guerriero. 2023. 4 Ways Teachers Can Harness the Power of ChatGPT. (2023). https://www.learningexplorer.com/blog/4-ways-teachers-can-harness-the-power-of-chatgpt Accessed on: August 14, 2023.
  14. Juan David Gutiérrez. 2023. Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in University Courses. Version 4.3.1. Universidad del Rosario. https://forogpp.files.wordpress.com/2023/02/guidelines-for-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-university-courses-v4.3.1.pdf License C.C. BY 4.0.
  15. Edmund Hansen. 2011. IDEA-based learning: A course design process to promote conceptual understanding. Stylus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445203
  16. R. M. HARDEN. 1999. AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1-An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher 21, 1 (1999), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979969 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979969
  17. Who Answers It Better? An In-Depth Analysis of ChatGPT and Stack Overflow Answers to Software Engineering Questions. arXiv:2308.02312 [cs.SE] https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02312
  18. Sam Lau and Philip J. Guo. 2023. From ”Ban It Till We Understand It” to ”Resistance is Futile”: How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Chicago, IL, USA) (ICER ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568813.3600138
  19. Hyunsu Lee. 2023. The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education (14 March 2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270 arXiv:https://anatomypubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ase.2270
  20. GitHub Copilot AI pair programmer: Asset or Liability? Journal of Systems and Software 203 (2023), 111734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111734
  21. ChatGPT, Can You Generate Solutions for my Coding Exercises? An Evaluation on its Effectiveness in an undergraduate Java Programming Course. arXiv:2305.13680 [cs.SE]
  22. Kiruthika Ragupathi and Adrian Lee. 2020. Beyond fairness and consistency in grading: The role of rubrics in higher education. Diversity and inclusion in global higher education: Lessons from across Asia (2020), 73–95.
  23. Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Lugano and Virtual Event, Switzerland) (ICER ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501385.3543957
  24. Thrilled by Your Progress! Large Language Models (GPT-4) No Longer Struggle to Pass Assessments in Higher Education Programming Courses. In Proceedings of the The 19th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ’23, Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3568813.3600142
  25. Muhammad Shidiq. 2023. The Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chat-GPT and Its Challenges For The World of Education; From the Viewpoint of the Development of Creative Writing Skills. PROCEEDING OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, SOCIETY AND HUMANITY 1, 1 (2023), 353–357. https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/icesh/article/view/5614
  26. Jiahong Su and Weipeng Yang. 2023. Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education. ECNU Review of Education 0, 0 (April 2023), 20965311231168423. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423
  27. Taylor Telford and Pranshu Verma. 2023. Employees want ChatGPT at work. Bosses worry they’ll spill secrets. The Washington Post (Jul 2023). https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2023/07/10/chatgpt-safe-company-work-ban-lawyers-code/
  28. Owen Kichizo Terry. 2023. I’m a Student. You Have No Idea How Much We’re Using ChatGPT. https://www.chronicle.com/article/im-a-student-you-have-no-idea-how-much-were-using-chatgpt Accessed on: August 14, 2023.
  29. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments 10, 1 (22 Feb 2023), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  30. Norman L Webb. 2002. Depth-of-knowledge levels for four content areas. Language Arts 28, March (2002), 1–9.
  31. Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text. arXiv:2306.15666 [cs.CL]
  32. Michel Wermelinger. 2023. Using GitHub Copilot to Solve Simple Programming Problems. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Toronto ON, Canada) (SIGCSE 2023). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569830
  33. A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT. arXiv:2302.11382 [cs.SE]
  34. Ramazan Yilmaz and Fatma Gizem Karaoglan Yilmaz. 2023. Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 1, 2 (2023), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005
  35. Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 437, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581388
  36. From substitution to redefinition: A framework of machine learning-based science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57, 9 (Oct. 2020), 1430–1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21658
  37. Donna Harp Ziegenfuss. 2007. A Phenomenographic Analysis of Course Design in the Academy. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research 2, 1 (2007).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Ethan Dickey (8 papers)
  2. Andres Bejarano (4 papers)
Citations (5)
View on Semantic Scholar