Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

What Went Wrong? Closing the Sim-to-Real Gap via Differentiable Causal Discovery (2306.15864v2)

Published 28 Jun 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: Training control policies in simulation is more appealing than on real robots directly, as it allows for exploring diverse states in an efficient manner. Yet, robot simulators inevitably exhibit disparities from the real-world \rebut{dynamics}, yielding inaccuracies that manifest as the dynamical simulation-to-reality (sim-to-real) gap. Existing literature has proposed to close this gap by actively modifying specific simulator parameters to align the simulated data with real-world observations. However, the set of tunable parameters is usually manually selected to reduce the search space in a case-by-case manner, which is hard to scale up for complex systems and requires extensive domain knowledge. To address the scalability issue and automate the parameter-tuning process, we introduce COMPASS, which aligns the simulator with the real world by discovering the causal relationship between the environment parameters and the sim-to-real gap. Concretely, our method learns a differentiable mapping from the environment parameters to the differences between simulated and real-world robot-object trajectories. This mapping is governed by a simultaneously learned causal graph to help prune the search space of parameters, provide better interpretability, and improve generalization on unseen parameters. We perform experiments to achieve both sim-to-sim and sim-to-real transfer, and show that our method has significant improvements in trajectory alignment and task success rate over strong baselines in several challenging manipulation tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Peide Huang (15 papers)
  2. Xilun Zhang (4 papers)
  3. Ziang Cao (17 papers)
  4. Shiqi Liu (31 papers)
  5. Mengdi Xu (27 papers)
  6. Wenhao Ding (43 papers)
  7. Jonathan Francis (48 papers)
  8. Bingqing Chen (17 papers)
  9. Ding Zhao (172 papers)
Citations (15)