Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 61 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 452 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Prioritized Trajectory Replay: A Replay Memory for Data-driven Reinforcement Learning (2306.15503v2)

Published 27 Jun 2023 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: In recent years, data-driven reinforcement learning (RL), also known as offline RL, have gained significant attention. However, the role of data sampling techniques in offline RL has been overlooked despite its potential to enhance online RL performance. Recent research suggests applying sampling techniques directly to state-transitions does not consistently improve performance in offline RL. Therefore, in this study, we propose a memory technique, (Prioritized) Trajectory Replay (TR/PTR), which extends the sampling perspective to trajectories for more comprehensive information extraction from limited data. TR enhances learning efficiency by backward sampling of trajectories that optimizes the use of subsequent state information. Building on TR, we build the weighted critic target to avoid sampling unseen actions in offline training, and Prioritized Trajectory Replay (PTR) that enables more efficient trajectory sampling, prioritized by various trajectory priority metrics. We demonstrate the benefits of integrating TR and PTR with existing offline RL algorithms on D4RL. In summary, our research emphasizes the significance of trajectory-based data sampling techniques in enhancing the efficiency and performance of offline RL algorithms.

Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper introduces Trajectory Replay (TR) to sample full trajectories using backward sampling, significantly enhancing offline RL performance.
  • It incorporates weighted target estimation to balance exploration and exploitation, effectively reducing sampling of out-of-distribution actions.
  • Empirical evaluations on D4RL benchmarks demonstrate that prioritized trajectory replay (PTR) accelerates learning in complex, sparse reward tasks.

Prioritized Trajectory Replay: A Replay Memory for Data-driven Reinforcement Learning

The paper "Prioritized Trajectory Replay: A Replay Memory for Data-driven Reinforcement Learning" explores the significance of data sampling techniques for offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) and proposes novel methodologies to enhance the efficiency of RL algorithms. The focus lies on trajectory-based sampling as opposed to state-transition-based sampling, which has shown limited success in offline RL. The proposal introduces a memory technique, Trajectory Replay (TR) and its prioritized form (PTR), demonstrating their integration with existing offline RL algorithms on the D4RL benchmark.

Introduction to Trajectory Replay

Offline RL has garnered substantial interest due to its utility in scenarios where interaction with real environments is costly. Traditional offline RL practices primarily emphasize on conservative training algorithms and network architectures. However, data sampling, a crucial component for improving learning efficacy, remains underexplored.

This paucity of exploration in offline RL is addressed by introducing Trajectory Replay (TR), which facilitates sampling from complete trajectories rather than isolated state transitions. TR leverages backward sampling, thereby enriching the learning process with information from successive state transitions. Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: A motivating example on finite data. Left: The illustration of state transitions in three trajectories τi\tau_i started at state s0s_0, with the reward rr for labeled state or 0 for others, and four different sampling techniques. Middle and right: Curves of the estimated maximum QQ-value at state s0s_0 learned on these three trajectories. The solid line is the averaged value over 50 seeds, and the shaded area the standard variance. The oracle value, taking into account the discount factor, is slightly less than 8.

Implementation of Prioritized Trajectory Replay

Trajectory Replay: Backward Sampling Strategy

TR stores offline data as trajectories and implements backward sampling of these trajectories. This approach allows for accelerated reward propagation, which is particularly advantageous in sparse reward environments. The backward sampling of TR is effectively illustrated in the backward sampling process, where the last state transitions are sampled first, allowing earlier states to leverage the learned knowledge from later states.

Weighted Target Estimation

To address extrapolation errors, which are significant challenges in offline RL, TR is extended by formulating a weighted target estimation. This extension combines the standard Q-learning update with a SARSA-style update, balancing exploration and exploitation while averting sampling of out-of-distribution (OOD) actions.

Prioritized Trajectory Sampling Metrics

Building on TR, the introduction of Prioritized Trajectory Replay (PTR) enhances sampling efficiency by utilizing various trajectory priority metrics. These include trajectory quality metrics (e.g., reward mean) and uncertainty measures. Theoretical criticism prioritizes the sampling efficiency through probabilistic selections based on these trajectory attributes. Figure 2

Figure 2: Overview of the process of data sampling based on Trajectory Replay.

Experimental Evaluation

Empirical evaluations performed on D4RL benchmarks, consisting of Mujoco, Adroit, and AntMaze datasets, demonstrate significant improvements when TR and PTR are applied. The backward sampling in TR notably benefits sparse reward tasks, as evidenced by increased normalized scores on these datasets. Moreover, PTR, utilizing prioritized sampling, further boosts performance, with reward quality and uncertainty effectively guiding trajectory prioritization in different environments. Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Comparison of the performance of PTR compared to TD3+BC under 10 different trajectory priority metrics. In the figure we restrict the performance difference to a maximum of 20.

Computationally, PTR incurs slightly higher costs, primarily due to trajectory maintenance and priority updates, yet these are justified by the substantial gains in learning efficiency.

Conclusion

The paper underscores the importance of trajectory-based sampling techniques in offline RL, introducing Trajectory Replay (TR) and its prioritized variant (PTR) as versatile tools for improving algorithm performance. While demonstrating remarkable practical advancements, this work opens avenues for refining trajectory prioritization metrics and exploring enhancements in target computation methods. The integration of these techniques with complex RL frameworks holds promise for advancing data-driven AI capabilities in various domains.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.