Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Critic Regularized Regression (2006.15134v3)

Published 26 Jun 2020 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and stat.ML

Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL), also known as batch RL, offers the prospect of policy optimization from large pre-recorded datasets without online environment interaction. It addresses challenges with regard to the cost of data collection and safety, both of which are particularly pertinent to real-world applications of RL. Unfortunately, most off-policy algorithms perform poorly when learning from a fixed dataset. In this paper, we propose a novel offline RL algorithm to learn policies from data using a form of critic-regularized regression (CRR). We find that CRR performs surprisingly well and scales to tasks with high-dimensional state and action spaces -- outperforming several state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms by a significant margin on a wide range of benchmark tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Ziyu Wang (137 papers)
  2. Alexander Novikov (30 papers)
  3. Konrad Zolna (24 papers)
  4. Jost Tobias Springenberg (48 papers)
  5. Scott Reed (32 papers)
  6. Bobak Shahriari (16 papers)
  7. Noah Siegel (10 papers)
  8. Josh Merel (31 papers)
  9. Caglar Gulcehre (71 papers)
  10. Nicolas Heess (139 papers)
  11. Nando de Freitas (98 papers)
Citations (305)

Summary

Critic Regularized Regression: Advancements in Offline Reinforcement Learning

The paper "Critic Regularized Regression" addresses key challenges in the field of reinforcement learning (RL) with an emphasis on offline RL, also known as batch RL. Offline RL emphasizes learning policies from pre-recorded datasets without engaging in further interactions with the environment, which is crucial for applications where data collection is costly or hazardous, such as in medical or industrial domains. The paper introduces a method named Critic Regularized Regression (CRR), a novel approach aimed at improving policy learning by filtering the data used to train policies, selectively incorporating data informed by value-based filtering.

Background and Motivation

Discrepancies often arise when off-policy RL algorithms are applied in an offline setting, resulting from overly optimistic Q-value estimates and poor extrapolation beyond the available data. This is especially true in RL tasks that incorporate bootstrapping, where the policy learns iteratively from its own estimations. As offline RL separates the learning of policies from environment interaction, it remains prone to overestimation and inappropriate generalizations that can impede policy fidelity and efficacy.

The allure of offline RL is rooted in its potential to leverage large-scale, historically collected datasets to derive optimal policies without the traditional challenges associated with online exploration, most notably the risks and expenses involved in data acquisition from real-world systems. Despite extensive exploration, much of the existing research has sought to mitigate off-policy dysfunction within offline data constraints, primarily through mechanisms restricting policy actions to training data support.

Contribution of Critic Regularized Regression

CRR advances this discourse by proposing an algorithm that simplifies offline policy optimization into a process resembling value-filtered regression. With this, CRR is formulated to work cohesively with standard actor-critic methods and requires minimal algorithm modification. At its core, CRR tackles two critical assumptions: the need for reliance on high-fidelity data within the offline dataset and the risk of extrapolating policy actions into regions of low certainty, as signified by property's implausibly high value estimates.

The CRR algorithm incorporates a value function-driven filtration step that selects actions aligned with state expectations measured via the policy's Q-function. The process can be invoked through two primary variants: binary filtering, leveraging an advantage function identifier, and exponential weighting, framing regularized policy iteration for optimized action selection.

Experimental Evaluations

CRR delivers significant performance improvements, outperforming state-of-the-art approaches across various benchmark suites, including those with high-dimensional action spaces. This success is underscored by comparisons to existing benchmarks such as Behavioral Cloning (BC), Batch-Constrained deep Q-learning (BCQ), and Advantage-Weighted Regression (AWR). The ease of integrating CRR into extant actor-critic frameworks delineates its practicality and adaptability.

Implications and Future Directions

CRR's performance underscores its potential for reliable policy derivation from offline datasets without resorting to online explorations. This characteristic holds substantial promise for real-world applications, suggesting enhanced avenues for safe RL deployment across sectors where risk mitigation is paramount. Furthermore, as CRR scales effectively with data complexity, it posits a meaningful advancement in the treatment of diverse, high-variable datasets, common within industrial-scale applications.

Moving forward, CRR opens numerous future research avenues, particularly in refining its approach to filter and weight actions—potentially through more sophisticated network structures or iterations that consider uncertainty models directly within the policy update phases. This could harness advances in AI, such as distributional RL, to manage uncertainty and prioritization of dataset sections more effectively.

In conclusion, this paper offers an insightful and detailed contribution to offline reinforcement learning, notably through Critic Regularized Regression. It proposes an innovative framework to circumvent specific issues inherent to offline RL applications, providing a robust method capable of seamlessly deploying in areas where online RL poses significant ethical or practical challenges.