Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 95 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Mass Measurement of $^{27}$P to Constrain Type-I X-ray Burst Models and Validate the IMME for the A=27, T=$\frac{3}{2}$ Isospin Quartet (2306.10163v2)

Published 16 Jun 2023 in nucl-ex and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: Light curves are the primary observable of type-I x-ray bursts. Computational x-ray burst models must match simulations to observed light curves. Most of the error in simulated curves comes from uncertainties in $rp$ process reaction rates, which can be reduced via precision mass measurements of neutron-deficient isotopes in the $rp$ process path. We perform a precise Penning trap mass measurement of ${27}$P utilizing the ToF-ICR technique. We use this measurement to calculate $rp$ process reaction rates and input these rates into an x-ray burst model to reduce simulated light curve uncertainty. We also use the mass measurement of ${27}$P to validate the Isobaric Multiplet Mass Equation (IMME) for the A=27 T=$\frac{3}{2}$ isospin quartet which ${27}$P belongs to. The mass excess of ${27}$P was measured to be -670.7(6) keV, a fourteen-fold precision increase over the mass reported in the 2020 Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME2020). X-ray burst light curves were produced with the MESA (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) code using the new mass and associated reaction rates. Changes in the mass of ${27}$P seem to have minimal effect on light curves, even in burster systems tailored to maximize impact. The mass of ${27}$P does not play a significant role in x-ray burst light curves. It is important to understand that more advanced models do not just provide more precise results, but often qualitatively different ones. This result brings us a step closer to extracting stellar parameters from individual x-ray burst observations. The IMME has been validated for the $A=27, T=3/2$ quartet. The normal quadratic form of the IMME using the latest data yields a reduced $\chi2$ of 2.9. The cubic term required to generate an exact fit to the latest data matches theoretical attempts to predict this term.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.