Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Joint Action is a Framework for Understanding Partnerships Between Humans and Upper Limb Prostheses (2212.14124v1)

Published 28 Dec 2022 in cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.MA, and cs.RO

Abstract: Recent advances in upper limb prostheses have led to significant improvements in the number of movements provided by the robotic limb. However, the method for controlling multiple degrees of freedom via user-generated signals remains challenging. To address this issue, various machine learning controllers have been developed to better predict movement intent. As these controllers become more intelligent and take on more autonomy in the system, the traditional approach of representing the human-machine interface as a human controlling a tool becomes limiting. One possible approach to improve the understanding of these interfaces is to model them as collaborative, multi-agent systems through the lens of joint action. The field of joint action has been commonly applied to two human partners who are trying to work jointly together to achieve a task, such as singing or moving a table together, by effecting coordinated change in their shared environment. In this work, we compare different prosthesis controllers (proportional electromyography with sequential switching, pattern recognition, and adaptive switching) in terms of how they present the haLLMarks of joint action. The results of the comparison lead to a new perspective for understanding how existing myoelectric systems relate to each other, along with recommendations for how to improve these systems by increasing the collaborative communication between each partner.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Michael R. Dawson (3 papers)
  2. Adam S. R. Parker (7 papers)
  3. Heather E. Williams (1 paper)
  4. Ahmed W. Shehata (1 paper)
  5. Jacqueline S. Hebert (1 paper)
  6. Patrick M. Pilarski (35 papers)
  7. Craig S. Chapman (2 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.