Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 213 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Systematic Investigation of Dust and Gaseous CO in 12 Nearby Molecular Clouds (2203.07480v2)

Published 14 Mar 2022 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We report the first uniform and systematic study of dust and molecular gas in nearby molecular clouds. We use surveys of dust extinction and emission to determine the opacity and map the distribution of the dust within a dozen local clouds in order to derive a uniform set of basic cloud properties. We find: 1) the average dust opacity $\langle\kappa_{d,353}\rangle = 0.8\ {\rm cm{2}\, g{-1}}$ with variations of a factor of $\sim$ 2 between clouds, 2) cloud PDFs are exquisitely described by steeply falling power-laws with a narrow range of slope, and 3) a tight $M_{\rm GMC} \sim R_{\rm GMC}2$ scaling relation for the cloud sample, indicative of a cloud population with an exactingly constant average surface density above a common fixed boundary. We compare these results to uniformly analyzed CO surveys. We measure the CO mass conversion factors and assess the efficacy of CO for tracing the physical properties of molecular clouds. We find $\langle \alpha_{\rm CO}\rangle = 4.31 \pm 0.67$ M$\odot$ (K km s${-1}$ pc$2$)${-1}$ (corresponding to $X{\rm CO}$ = 1.97 $\times$ 10${20}$ cm${-2}$(K km s${-1}$)${-1}$). We demonstrate that CO observations are a poor tracer of column density and structure on sub-cloud spatial scales. On cloud scales, CO observations can provide measurements consistent with those of the dust, provided data are analyzed in a similar, self-consistent fashion. Measurements of average GMC surface density are sensitive to choice of cloud boundary. Care must be exercised to adopt common fixed boundaries when comparing surface densities for cloud populations within and between galaxies.

Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.