Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 59 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 104 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Empirical limb-darkening coefficients & transit parameters of known exoplanets from TESS (2203.05661v1)

Published 10 Mar 2022 in astro-ph.EP and astro-ph.SR

Abstract: Although the main goal of the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (\textit{TESS}) is to search for new transiting exoplanets, its data can also be used to study in further detail already known systems. The \textit{TESS} bandpass is particularly interesting to study the limb-darkening effect of the stellar host which is imprinted in transit lightcurves, as the widely used \textsc{phoenix} and \textsc{atlas} stellar models predict different limb-darkening profiles. Here we study this effect by fitting the transit lightcurves of 176 known exoplanetary systems observed by \textit{TESS}, which allows us to extract empirical limb-darkening coefficients (LDCs) for the widely used quadratic law, but also updated transit parameters (including ephemerides refinements) as a byproduct. Comparing our empirically obtained LDCs with theoretical predictions, we find significant offsets when using tabulated \textit{TESS} LDCs. Specifically, the $u_2$ coefficients obtained using \textsc{phoenix} models show the largest discrepancies depending on the method used to derive them, with offsets that can reach up to $\Delta u_2 \approx 0.2$ on average. Most of those average offsets disappear, however, if one uses the SPAM algorithm introduced by Howarth (2011) to calculate the LDCs instead. Our results suggest, however, that for stars cooler than about 5000 K, no methodology is good enough to explain the limb-darkening effect: we observe a sharp deviation between measured and predicted LDCs on both quadratic LDCs of order $\Delta u_1, \Delta u_2 \approx 0.2$ for those cool stars. We recommend caution when assuming limb-darkening coefficients as perfectly known thus, in particular for these cooler stars when analyzing \textit{TESS} transit lightcurves.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube