Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 424 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The MASSIVE Survey -- XVII. A Triaxial Orbit-based Determination of the Black Hole Mass and Intrinsic Shape of Elliptical Galaxy NGC 2693 (2111.13699v2)

Published 26 Nov 2021 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We present a stellar dynamical mass measurement of a newly detected supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center of the fast-rotating, massive elliptical galaxy NGC 2693 as part of the MASSIVE survey. We combine high signal-to-noise integral field spectroscopy (IFS) from the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) with wide-field data from the Mitchell Spectrograph at McDonald Observatory to extract and model stellar kinematics of NGC 2693 from the central $\sim 150$ pc out to $\sim2.5$ effective radii. Observations from Hubble Space Telescope (HST) WFC3 are used to determine the stellar light distribution. We perform fully triaxial Schwarzschild orbit modeling using the latest TriOS code and a Bayesian search in 6-D galaxy model parameter space to determine NGC 2693's SMBH mass ($M_\text{BH}$), stellar mass-to-light ratio, dark matter content, and intrinsic shape. We find $M_\text{BH} = \left(1.7\pm 0.4\right)\times 10{9}\ M_\odot$ and a triaxial intrinsic shape with axis ratios $p=b/a=0.902 \pm 0.009$ and $q=c/a=0.721{+0.011}_{-0.010}$, triaxiality parameter $T = 0.39 \pm 0.04$. In comparison, the best-fit orbit model in the axisymmetric limit and (cylindrical) Jeans anisotropic model of NGC 2693 prefer $M_\text{BH} = \left(2.4\pm 0.6\right)\times 10{9}\ M_\odot$ and $M_\text{BH} = \left(2.9\pm 0.3\right)\times 10{9}\ M_\odot$, respectively. Neither model can account for the non-axisymmetric stellar velocity features present in the IFS data.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.