Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

What Makes Agile Software Development Agile? (2109.11435v1)

Published 23 Sep 2021 in cs.SE

Abstract: Together with many success stories, promises such as the increase in production speed and the improvement in stakeholders' collaboration have contributed to making agile a transformation in the software industry in which many companies want to take part. However, driven either by a natural and expected evolution or by contextual factors that challenge the adoption of agile methods as prescribed by their creator(s), software processes in practice mutate into hybrids over time. Are these still agile? In this article, we investigate the question: what makes a software development method agile? We present an empirical study grounded in a large-scale international survey that aims to identify software development methods and practices that improve or tame agility. Based on 556 data points, we analyze the perceived degree of agility in the implementation of standard project disciplines and its relation to used development methods and practices. Our findings suggest that only a small number of participants operate their projects in a purely traditional or agile manner (under 15%). That said, most project disciplines and most practices show a clear trend towards increasing degrees of agility. Compared to the methods used to develop software, the selection of practices has a stronger effect on the degree of agility of a given discipline. Finally, there are no methods or practices that explicitly guarantee or prevent agility. We conclude that agility cannot be defined solely at the process level. Additional factors need to be taken into account when trying to implement or improve agility in a software company. Finally, we discuss the field of software process-related research in the light of our findings and present a roadmap for future research.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (47)
  1. Marco Kuhrmann (15 papers)
  2. Paolo Tell (9 papers)
  3. Regina Hebig (11 papers)
  4. Jil Klünder (27 papers)
  5. Jürgen Münch (63 papers)
  6. Oliver Linssen (3 papers)
  7. Dietmar Pfahl (21 papers)
  8. Michael Felderer (77 papers)
  9. Christian R. Prause (2 papers)
  10. Stephen G. MacDonell (85 papers)
  11. Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende (15 papers)
  12. David Raffo (3 papers)
  13. Sarah Beecham (8 papers)
  14. Eray Tüzün (16 papers)
  15. Gustavo López (4 papers)
  16. Nicolas Paez (1 paper)
  17. Diego Fontdevila (2 papers)
  18. Sherlock A. Licorish (36 papers)
  19. Steffen Küpper (4 papers)
  20. Günther Ruhe (1 paper)
Citations (47)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.