Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 90 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Galaxy Core Formation by Supermassive Black Hole Binaries: the Importance of Realistic Initial Conditions and Galaxy Morphology (2108.08317v2)

Published 18 Aug 2021 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: The binding energy liberated by the coalescence of supermassive black hole (SMBH) binaries during galaxy mergers is thought to be responsible for the low density cores often found in bright elliptical galaxies. We use high-resolution $N$-body and Monte Carlo techniques to perform single and multi-stage galaxy merger simulations and systematically study the dependence of the central galaxy properties on the binary mass ratio, the slope of the initial density cusps, and the number of mergers experienced. We study both the amount of depleted stellar mass (or ``mass deficit'), $M_{\rm def}$, and the radial extent of the depleted region, $r_{\rm b}$. We find that $r_{\rm b}\simeq r_{\rm SOI}$ and that $M_{\rm def}$ varies in the range $0.5$ to $4M_{\bullet}$, with $r_{\rm SOI}$ the influence radius of the remnant SMBH and $M_{\bullet}$ its mass. The coefficients in these relations depend weakly on the binary mass ratio and remain remarkably constant through subsequent mergers. We conclude that the core size and mass deficit do not scale linearly with the number of mergers, making it hard to infer merger histories from observations. On the other hand, we show that both $M_{\rm def}$ and $r_{\rm b}$ are sensitive to the morphology of the galaxy merger remnant, and that adopting spherical initial conditions, as done in early work, leads to misleading results. Our models reproduce the range of values for $M_{\rm def}$ found in most observational work, but span nearly an order of magnitude range around the true ejected stellar mass.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube