Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Clinical Named Entity Recognition using Contextualized Token Representations (2106.12608v1)

Published 23 Jun 2021 in cs.CL and q-bio.QM

Abstract: The clinical named entity recognition (CNER) task seeks to locate and classify clinical terminologies into predefined categories, such as diagnostic procedure, disease disorder, severity, medication, medication dosage, and sign symptom. CNER facilitates the study of side-effect on medications including identification of novel phenomena and human-focused information extraction. Existing approaches in extracting the entities of interests focus on using static word embeddings to represent each word. However, one word can have different interpretations that depend on the context of the sentences. Evidently, static word embeddings are insufficient to integrate the diverse interpretation of a word. To overcome this challenge, the technique of contextualized word embedding has been introduced to better capture the semantic meaning of each word based on its context. Two of these LLMs, ELMo and Flair, have been widely used in the field of Natural Language Processing to generate the contextualized word embeddings on domain-generic documents. However, these embeddings are usually too general to capture the proximity among vocabularies of specific domains. To facilitate various downstream applications using clinical case reports (CCRs), we pre-train two deep contextualized LLMs, Clinical Embeddings from LLM (C-ELMo) and Clinical Contextual String Embeddings (C-Flair) using the clinical-related corpus from the PubMed Central. Explicit experiments show that our models gain dramatic improvements compared to both static word embeddings and domain-generic LLMs.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Yichao Zhou (33 papers)
  2. Chelsea Ju (3 papers)
  3. J. Harry Caufield (43 papers)
  4. Kevin Shih (6 papers)
  5. Calvin Chen (5 papers)
  6. Yizhou Sun (149 papers)
  7. Kai-Wei Chang (292 papers)
  8. Peipei Ping (10 papers)
  9. Wei Wang (1793 papers)
Citations (8)