Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Examining the Examiners: Students' Privacy and Security Perceptions of Online Proctoring Services (2106.05917v1)

Published 10 Jun 2021 in cs.CR and cs.HC

Abstract: In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, educational institutions quickly transitioned to remote learning. The problem of how to perform student assessment in an online environment has become increasingly relevant, leading many institutions and educators to turn to online proctoring services to administer remote exams. These services employ various student monitoring methods to curb cheating, including restricted ("lockdown") browser modes, video/screen monitoring, local network traffic analysis, and eye tracking. In this paper, we explore the security and privacy perceptions of the student test-takers being proctored. We analyze user reviews of proctoring services' browser extensions and subsequently perform an online survey (n=102). Our findings indicate that participants are concerned about both the amount and the personal nature of the information shared with the exam proctoring companies. However, many participants also recognize a trade-off between pandemic safety concerns and the arguably invasive means by which proctoring services ensure exam integrity. Our findings also suggest that institutional power dynamics and students' trust in their institutions may dissuade students' opposition to remote proctoring.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. David G. Balash (7 papers)
  2. Dongkun Kim (2 papers)
  3. Darikia Shaibekova (1 paper)
  4. Rahel A. Fainchtein (3 papers)
  5. Micah Sherr (6 papers)
  6. Adam J. Aviv (24 papers)
Citations (34)