Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Probing BERT in Hyperbolic Spaces (2104.03869v1)

Published 8 Apr 2021 in cs.CL

Abstract: Recently, a variety of probing tasks are proposed to discover linguistic properties learned in contextualized word embeddings. Many of these works implicitly assume these embeddings lay in certain metric spaces, typically the Euclidean space. This work considers a family of geometrically special spaces, the hyperbolic spaces, that exhibit better inductive biases for hierarchical structures and may better reveal linguistic hierarchies encoded in contextualized representations. We introduce a Poincare probe, a structural probe projecting these embeddings into a Poincare subspace with explicitly defined hierarchies. We focus on two probing objectives: (a) dependency trees where the hierarchy is defined as head-dependent structures; (b) lexical sentiments where the hierarchy is defined as the polarity of words (positivity and negativity). We argue that a key desideratum of a probe is its sensitivity to the existence of linguistic structures. We apply our probes on BERT, a typical contextualized embedding model. In a syntactic subspace, our probe better recovers tree structures than Euclidean probes, revealing the possibility that the geometry of BERT syntax may not necessarily be Euclidean. In a sentiment subspace, we reveal two possible meta-embeddings for positive and negative sentiments and show how lexically-controlled contextualization would change the geometric localization of embeddings. We demonstrate the findings with our Poincare probe via extensive experiments and visualization. Our results can be reproduced at https://github.com/FranxYao/PoincareProbe.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Boli Chen (23 papers)
  2. Yao Fu (83 papers)
  3. Guangwei Xu (18 papers)
  4. Pengjun Xie (85 papers)
  5. Chuanqi Tan (56 papers)
  6. Mosha Chen (17 papers)
  7. Liping Jing (33 papers)
Citations (51)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com