Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 216 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Rotation Measure Evolution of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 121102 (2009.12135v2)

Published 25 Sep 2020 in astro-ph.HE

Abstract: The repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102 has been shown to have an exceptionally high and variable Faraday rotation measure (RM), which must be imparted within its host galaxy and likely by or within its local environment. In the redshifted ($z=0.193$) source reference frame, the RM decreased from $1.46\times105$~rad~m${-2}$ to $1.33\times105$~rad~m${-2}$ between January and August 2017, showing day-timescale variations of $\sim200$~rad~m${-2}$. Here we present sixteen FRB 121102 RMs from burst detections with the Arecibo 305-m radio telescope, the Effelsberg 100-m, and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array, providing a record of FRB 121102's RM over a 2.5-year timespan. Our observations show a decreasing trend in RM, although the trend is not linear, dropping by an average of 15\% year${-1}$ and is $\sim9.7\times104$~rad~m${-2}$ at the most recent epoch of August 2019. Erratic, short-term RM variations of $\sim103$~rad~m${-2}$ week${-1}$ were also observed between MJDs 58215--58247. A decades-old neutron star embedded within a still-compact supernova remnant or a neutron star near a massive black hole and its accretion torus have been proposed to explain the high RMs. We compare the observed RMs to theoretical models describing the RM evolution for FRBs originating within a supernova remnant. FRB 121102's age is unknown, and we find that the models agree for source ages of $\sim6-17$~years at the time of the first available RM measurements in 2017. We also draw comparisons to the decreasing RM of the Galactic center magnetar, PSR J1745--2900.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.