Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantum versus Classical Generative Modelling in Finance (2008.00691v1)

Published 3 Aug 2020 in quant-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: Finding a concrete use case for quantum computers in the near term is still an open question, with machine learning typically touted as one of the first fields which will be impacted by quantum technologies. In this work, we investigate and compare the capabilities of quantum versus classical models for the task of generative modelling in machine learning. We use a real world financial dataset consisting of correlated currency pairs and compare two models in their ability to learn the resulting distribution - a restricted Boltzmann machine, and a quantum circuit Born machine. We provide extensive numerical results indicating that the simulated Born machine always at least matches the performance of the Boltzmann machine in this task, and demonstrates superior performance as the model scales. We perform experiments on both simulated and physical quantum chips using the Rigetti forest platform, and also are able to partially train the largest instance to date of a quantum circuit Born machine on quantum hardware. Finally, by studying the entanglement capacity of the training Born machines, we find that entanglement typically plays a role in the problem instances which demonstrate an advantage over the Boltzmann machine.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Brian Coyle (15 papers)
  2. Maxwell Henderson (5 papers)
  3. Justin Chan Jin Le (1 paper)
  4. Niraj Kumar (49 papers)
  5. Marco Paini (4 papers)
  6. Elham Kashefi (95 papers)
Citations (54)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.