Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Making Affine Correspondences Work in Camera Geometry Computation (2007.10032v1)

Published 20 Jul 2020 in cs.CV

Abstract: Local features e.g. SIFT and its affine and learned variants provide region-to-region rather than point-to-point correspondences. This has recently been exploited to create new minimal solvers for classical problems such as homography, essential and fundamental matrix estimation. The main advantage of such solvers is that their sample size is smaller, e.g., only two instead of four matches are required to estimate a homography. Works proposing such solvers often claim a significant improvement in run-time thanks to fewer RANSAC iterations. We show that this argument is not valid in practice if the solvers are used naively. To overcome this, we propose guidelines for effective use of region-to-region matches in the course of a full model estimation pipeline. We propose a method for refining the local feature geometries by symmetric intensity-based matching, combine uncertainty propagation inside RANSAC with preemptive model verification, show a general scheme for computing uncertainty of minimal solvers results, and adapt the sample cheirality check for homography estimation. Our experiments show that affine solvers can achieve accuracy comparable to point-based solvers at faster run-times when following our guidelines. We make code available at https://github.com/danini/affine-correspondences-for-camera-geometry.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Daniel Barath (71 papers)
  2. Michal Polic (5 papers)
  3. Wolfgang Förstner (5 papers)
  4. Torsten Sattler (72 papers)
  5. Tomas Pajdla (38 papers)
  6. Zuzana Kukelova (37 papers)
Citations (21)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.