Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 99 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 40 tok/s
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 161 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Review of Zeeman Effect Observations of Regions of Star Formation (1911.06210v1)

Published 14 Nov 2019 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: (Edited for length) The Zeeman effect is the only observational technique available to measure directly the strength of magnetic fields in regions of star formation. We review the physics of the Zeeman effect and its practical use in both extended gas and in masers. We discuss observational results for the five species for which the Zeeman effect has been detected in the ISM -- H~I, OH, and CN in extended gas and OH, CH$_3$OH, and H$_2$O in masers. These species span densities from $\sim10$ cm${-3}$ to $\sim10{10}$ cm ${-3}$, which allows magnetic fields to be measured over the full range of cloud densities. However, there are significant limitations, including that only the line-of-sight component of the magnetic field strength can usually be measured and that there are often significant uncertainties about the physical conditions being sampled, particularly for masers. We discuss statistical methods to partially overcome these limitations. The results of Zeeman observations are that the mass to magnetic flux ratio is subcritical (gravity dominates magnetic support) at lower densities but supercritical for $N_H \gtrsim 10{22}$ cm${-2}$. Above $n_H\sim 300$ cm${-3}$, which is roughly the density at which clouds typically become self-gravitating, the strength of magnetic fields increases approximately as $B \propto n{2/3}$, which suggest that magnetic fields do not provide significant support at high densities. This is consistent with high-density clouds being supercritical. However, magnetic fields have a large range in strengths at any given density, so the role of magnetic fields should differ significantly from one cloud to another. And for maser regions the dependence of field strength on density may have a slightly lower slope. Turbulent reconnection theory seems to best match the Zeeman observational results.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.