Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TASTE: Temporal and Static Tensor Factorization for Phenotyping Electronic Health Records (1911.05843v1)

Published 13 Nov 2019 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Phenotyping electronic health records (EHR) focuses on defining meaningful patient groups (e.g., heart failure group and diabetes group) and identifying the temporal evolution of patients in those groups. Tensor factorization has been an effective tool for phenotyping. Most of the existing works assume either a static patient representation with aggregate data or only model temporal data. However, real EHR data contain both temporal (e.g., longitudinal clinical visits) and static information (e.g., patient demographics), which are difficult to model simultaneously. In this paper, we propose Temporal And Static TEnsor factorization (TASTE) that jointly models both static and temporal information to extract phenotypes. TASTE combines the PARAFAC2 model with non-negative matrix factorization to model a temporal and a static tensor. To fit the proposed model, we transform the original problem into simpler ones which are optimally solved in an alternating fashion. For each of the sub-problems, our proposed mathematical reformulations lead to efficient sub-problem solvers. Comprehensive experiments on large EHR data from a heart failure (HF) study confirmed that TASTE is up to 14x faster than several baselines and the resulting phenotypes were confirmed to be clinically meaningful by a cardiologist. Using 80 phenotypes extracted by TASTE, a simple logistic regression can achieve the same level of area under the curve (AUC) for HF prediction compared to a deep learning model using recurrent neural networks (RNN) with 345 features.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Ardavan Afshar (7 papers)
  2. Ioakeim Perros (6 papers)
  3. Haesun Park (22 papers)
  4. Christopher deFilippi (2 papers)
  5. Xiaowei Yan (3 papers)
  6. Walter Stewart (2 papers)
  7. Joyce Ho (8 papers)
  8. Jimeng Sun (181 papers)
Citations (32)