Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 30 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

An accurate low-redshift measurement of the cosmic neutral hydrogen density (1907.10375v1)

Published 24 Jul 2019 in astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Using a spectral stacking technique, we measure the neutral hydrogen (HI) properties of a sample of galaxies at $z < 0.11$ across 35 pointings of the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT). The radio data contains 1,895 galaxies with redshifts and positions known from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We carefully quantified the effects of sample bias, aperture used to extract spectra, sidelobes and weighting technique and use our data to provide a new estimate for the cosmic HI mass density. We find a cosmic HI mass density of $\Omega_{\rm HI} = (4.02 \pm 0.26)\times 10{-4} h_{70}{-1}$ at $\langle z\rangle = 0.066$, consistent with measurements from blind HI surveys and other HI stacking experiments at low redshifts. The combination of the small interferometer beam size and the large survey volume makes our result highly robust against systematic effects due to confusion at small scales and cosmic variance at large scales. Splitting into three sub-samples with $\langle z\rangle$ = 0.038, 0.067 and 0.093 shows no significant evolution of the HI gas content at low redshift.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.