Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

LSM-based Storage Techniques: A Survey

Published 18 Dec 2018 in cs.DB | (1812.07527v3)

Abstract: Recently, the Log-Structured Merge-tree (LSM-tree) has been widely adopted for use in the storage layer of modern NoSQL systems. Because of this, there have been a large number of research efforts, from both the database community and the operating systems community, that try to improve various aspects of LSM-trees. In this paper, we provide a survey of recent research efforts on LSM-trees so that readers can learn the state-of-the-art in LSM-based storage techniques. We provide a general taxonomy to classify the literature of LSM-trees, survey the efforts in detail, and discuss their strengths and trade-offs. We further survey several representative LSM-based open-source NoSQL systems and discuss some potential future research directions resulting from the survey.

Citations (169)

Summary

  • The paper surveys advancements in LSM-tree design, evaluating strategies to enhance write performance and reduce write amplification.
  • It details methodologies such as tiered and leveled merge operations and highlights hardware optimizations to mitigate I/O bottlenecks.
  • The survey outlines future research directions, emphasizing hybrid merge policies and workload-specific enhancements.

Comprehensive Survey on LSM-based Storage Techniques

Introduction

The Log-Structured Merge (LSM) tree has become a core component in the storage layers of contemporary NoSQL systems due to its superior write performance, high space utilization, and simplified concurrency controls. This survey paper provides a detailed examination of various advancements in LSM-tree technology. It offers a taxonomy of existing improvements, explores the design choices in prominent NoSQL systems, and identifies potential future research directions.

LSM-tree Basics

The LSM-tree model achieves enhanced write performance by employing out-of-place updates, where incoming writes are buffered in memory and merged into disk storage sequentially. This design leverages sequential I/O operations to optimize disk writing operations, providing notable advantages over traditional in-place update data structures like B-trees. Variations exist in how these merge processes are managed across different levels of the tree, namely leveling and tiering strategies, each offering trade-offs between write performance and space utilization.

LSM-tree Improvements

Reducing Write Amplification

Recent advancements aim to optimize LSM-trees by reducing write amplification, which consequently extends the lifespan of devices like SSDs. Several strategies involve adopting tiered merge policies, exploiting data skew, or deploying merge skipping techniques, which selectively promote data to higher levels in the structure without intermediate merges.

Optimizing Merge Operations

Merge operations in LSM-trees are critical for maintaining efficient query performance. Innovations like pipelined merge operations and asynchronous index maintenance have been proposed to enhance throughput and reduce merge-induced cache misses or stalls. Handling concurrent merge tasks effectively is crucial for maintaining system performance under high write loads.

Exploiting Hardware Opportunities

Innovative designs have tailored LSM-trees to take advantage of modern hardware capabilities. Solutions span across deploying large memory components, optimizing for multi-core CPUs, and directly managing storage within SSDs/NVMs. These adaptations reduce the traditional I/O bottlenecks by efficiently utilizing available hardware resources.

Handling Special Workloads

To cater to specific use cases, tailored LSM-tree designs focus on handling temporal, spatial, or semi-sorted data efficiently. These designs can dramatically enhance performance, enabling efficient data access patterns or workload-specific optimizations.

Representative Systems

Several open-source NoSQL systems leverage LSM-trees prominently. Systems like LevelDB, RocksDB, HBase, Cassandra, and AsterixDB have implemented various storage layer optimizations tailored to meet their unique performance and operational requirements. These systems highlight diverse approaches to implementing merge policies, data partitioning, secondary indexing, and distributed data management.

Future Research Directions

Potential future research efforts include comprehensive performance evaluations against tuned baselines, exploring hybrid merge policies that combine the benefits of leveling and tiering, and minimizing performance variance to ensure consistent query latencies. As LSM-trees continue to evolve into database storage engines, tackling these challenges will drive further advancements in database management tasks.

Conclusion

This survey encapsulates the advancements and current state of research in LSM-based storage techniques. By providing a structured taxonomy and exploring detailed descriptions of various improvements, the paper guides researchers and practitioners towards optimizing performance, leveraging hardware advancements, and designing systems for specialized workloads. This synthesis of research insights serves as a valuable resource for further innovation in LSM-based system design and implementation.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (2)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 116 likes about this paper.